The walls came crumbling down on President Jacob Zuma and senior ANC members in cabinet and parliament.One by one their counsel  conceded before Constitutional Court justices that they were wrong to act against Public Protector Thuli Madonsela‘s report that found Zuma to have unduly benefited from non-security upgrades to his home.In her report in 2014 entitled “Secure in Comfort”, Madonsela said some features included in the R246-million security upgrades to Zuma‘s Nkandla residence were not security features. These included a cattle kraal, chicken run, visitors‘ centre and pool.First to concede was Zuma‘s counsel Jeremy Gauntlett SC who told the court that the president does not want to obstruct but bring an end to the Nkandla matter.Gauntlett said the Supreme Court of Appeal, in another case last year, had said that remedial action prescribed by the public protector is binding. “It is not necessary for this court to replough the furrow,” Gauntlett said.Advocate Lindi Nkosi-Thoma...

BL Premium

This article is reserved for our subscribers.

A subscription helps you enjoy the best of our business content every day along with benefits such as articles from our international business news partners; ProfileData financial data; and digital access to the Sunday Times and Sunday Times Daily.

Already subscribed? Simply sign in below.



Questions or problems? Email helpdesk@businesslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now