An umbrella fund is a retirement fund which multiple and possibly unrelated employers can join as opposed to a standalone fund. Picture: 123RF/ANDRIY POPOV
An umbrella fund is a retirement fund which multiple and possibly unrelated employers can join as opposed to a standalone fund. Picture: 123RF/ANDRIY POPOV

You might be a member of an umbrella retirement fund and not even know it. You probably don’t realise there could be both advantages and disadvantages in being a member of one of these funds instead of one set up to invest the savings you, your colleagues and employer make.

An umbrella fund is a retirement fund which multiple and possibly unrelated employers may join as opposed to a single fund established for one employer only. Umbrella funds are set up by a large financial institution, usually a life assurer, or by a union or bargaining council. They are very different from what are known as standalone funds, which are set up by a single employer for its employees only.

SA retirement funds are consolidating rapidly with umbrella funds growing strongly at the expense of stand-alone retirement funds. 10X Investments says pooling the retirement savings of members from multiple employers reduces the average cost per member and provides governance of the fund by professional trustees. Members should benefit from higher after-fee returns, it says.

Typically, your employer decides what fund you belong to as it also contributes to the fund on your behalf and it may favour an umbrella fund because the employer has less responsibility. When an umbrella fund is sponsored by a big financial institution it will set up the fund with professional trustees, including its own employees, and typically invest in the systems needed to administer and market the fund. The trustees then agree to buy administration, investment, group life and other services from the sponsor.

While members and employers are represented equally in a standalone fund, members of an umbrella fund typically only have representation through a management committee

While the professional trustees and investment in systems for the fund can be a big advantage, the conflict that arises from the sponsoring company providing all the services can result in high costs. 

Steven Nathan, CEO of 10X, says members may pay high recurring broker, administration and investment management fees amounting to up to 3% of your savings each year. This can eat up to 75% of your investment returns.  

Another problem with umbrella funds is the disclosure of costs. Comparing umbrella fund costs is difficult because fees can be charged and disclosed in many different ways. But this changed as of September 1 when the retirement savings cost (RSC) disclosure standard came into effect, compelling providers to disclose and break down costs in the same format.

All providers that are members of the Association for Savings and Investment SA (Asisa) must comply. Henceforth, providers will have to disclose the costs of investment management, advice, administration, and any other costs.

While members and employers are represented equally in a standalone fund, members of an umbrella fund typically only have representation through a management committee that can negotiate suitable group life benefits and investments with the umbrella fund’s wider choice.

There are good and bad umbrella funds. Pension Funds Adjudicator (PFA) Muvhango Lukhaimane says the funds responsible for the highest number of complaints to her office are umbrella funds for sectors, such as private security, or former bargaining council umbrella funds.

A few years ago, the Private Security Sector Provident Fund (PSSPF) accounted for almost 40% of complaints to the PFA’s office as it failed to allocate contributions timeously; failed to pay out benefits when due; provided incorrect information; failed to issue benefit statements; and failed to investigate death benefits timeously. 

Nathan says commercial umbrella funds are generally better than sector umbrella funds. However, Lukhaimane says a myriad of problems with commercial umbrella funds still end up as complaints to her office.

Members often complain about the low amounts they receive relative to the contributions made when they withdraw from the fund, typically because a significant portion of the contributions pay for group life and disability cover, and administration and investment costs, she says. 

Lukhaimane has also had valid complaints about the failure of commercial umbrella fund trustees to: 

  • Properly investigate a deceased member’s family circumstances before deciding on the distribution of death benefits.
  • Take suitable action when an employer fails to pay its contributions over to a fund.
  • Sign up members as soon as they join an employer. 

Umbrella funds are regulated by the Pension Funds Act, but the act doesn’t regulate the structure of umbrella funds or its role-players. This is expected to change when the Conduct of Financial Institutions (Cofi) Bill becomes law.

Commercial umbrella funds have set up a forum to engage with the pension fund regulator, the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA), about rules for umbrella funds. 

Shakeel Singh, CEO of Sanlam Umbrella Solutions, told a recent Sanlam employee benefits seminar that the conflict of interest is a big issue and it has been proposed that commercial umbrella funds have boards with 50% independent trustees. 

It has also been proposed that the role of the sponsor to provide services from its own or associated businesses be recognised, and that the board be able to accept these as long as they are in the best interests of the members.

Singh says the regulator wants the role of the sponsor clearly defined, and a distinction between the roles of the board and the sponsor. The FSCA wants rules on how a disagreement between the board and the sponsor will be handled and what would become of a fund in the event of the sponsor withdrawing sponsorship.