It is only through structural reform that the government can broaden SA’s tax base and ensure sustainable growth
24 February 2022 - 11:00
bySanisha Packirisamy
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
A strong and prosperous middle class is essential to a "successful economy and a cohesive society", given its purchasing power and contribution to the tax base, says the Organisation of Economic Co-operation & Development.
Yet, years after the globalisation of trade and liberalisation of markets boosted the growth of the middle class across emerging markets, financial and economic crises, and events such as Covid, have resulted in its steady erosion. This has been underscored by rising income and wealth inequality.
In SA, such socioeconomic hardship is not new. But Covid dealt the middle class a further blow, forcing many to change their expenditure patterns or turn to debt to make ends meet. At the same time, wealthier individuals experienced a faster recovery in jobs and income alike, and the lower end of the income-earning spectrum received some shelter in the form of government support efforts.
Data from the Southern Centre for Inequality Studies at Wits University shows that consumption taxes — including VAT, fuel levies and trade and excise taxes — account for the largest source of revenue locally (see graph).
Then consider the contribution of the middle class to aggregate consumption, and the "bracket creep" that arises from an increase in income taxes without an increase in real income.
And factor in the extra costs middle-income earners incur — for education, medical aid, private security bills and above-inflation utility tariff increases — as a result of the gaps in services offered by the state.
Financial and economic crises, and events such as Covid, have seen the steady erosion of the middle class
SA’s short-term fiscal and debt position has been made easier by the commodities boom. But that has no structural benefit in terms of income tax collection. Meanwhile, on the expenditure front, the government continues to face growing calls to expand the social grant system, even though the civil servant wage bill and debt service costs together gobble up nearly 45% of government expenditure. Many of the state-owned entities (SOEs) that provide critical services to SA still face financial malaise and continue to burden the government’s balance sheet.
Which all means that longer-term risks to fiscal consolidation and debt sustainability — and to overburdened taxpayers — remain.
Over the years, a smaller proportion of taxpayers has become responsible for an increasingly larger share of personal income tax. With the tax base growing more slowly than the population, the level of dependency on this shrinking tax base remains high. Annual tax statistics from the SA Revenue Service and National Treasury show that 5.2-million assessed taxpayers supported 18.2-million social grant recipients in the 2020/2021 fiscal year.
What is to be done?
On the bright side, the government appears reluctant to raise taxes in the current tepid economic environment, following an increasing household tax burden from 2003 to 2019.
But to contain its fiscal deficit, it needs to improve its strategy to extract taxes. This includes addressing noncompliance and enforcing the criminal prosecution of felonious taxpayers.
Second, the state needs to target a higher level of spending efficiency. Matching civil servant pay increases with productivity could help curb the wage bill, while the government’s new investment company, formed to manage its stakes in SOEs, should pave the way for public-private partnerships and the consolidation or disposal of these entities, where necessary.
Finally, should fiscal policy become even more distributive in the future, the government will need to keep the economy humming with higher and more durable growth that enhances employment opportunities.
For this, it needs to concentrate its efforts on improving the inclusiveness of growth — in partnership with the private sector — by fostering upward economic mobility. It can do this by reducing costs in the network industry, removing excessive regulatory red tape and addressing the slide in governance that has weakened SA’s institutions.
Ultimately, such structural reforms will be the best way to broaden SA’s tax base and restore fiscal space, while also easing the unemployment and inequality quandary. It is through reform that the government can rescue SA from its low growth trap, and cultivate sustainability.
*Packirisamy is an economist at Momentum Investments
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
SANISHA PACKIRISAMY: How to widen the tax net
It is only through structural reform that the government can broaden SA’s tax base and ensure sustainable growth
A strong and prosperous middle class is essential to a "successful economy and a cohesive society", given its purchasing power and contribution to the tax base, says the Organisation of Economic Co-operation & Development.
Yet, years after the globalisation of trade and liberalisation of markets boosted the growth of the middle class across emerging markets, financial and economic crises, and events such as Covid, have resulted in its steady erosion. This has been underscored by rising income and wealth inequality.
In SA, such socioeconomic hardship is not new. But Covid dealt the middle class a further blow, forcing many to change their expenditure patterns or turn to debt to make ends meet. At the same time, wealthier individuals experienced a faster recovery in jobs and income alike, and the lower end of the income-earning spectrum received some shelter in the form of government support efforts.
Data from the Southern Centre for Inequality Studies at Wits University shows that consumption taxes — including VAT, fuel levies and trade and excise taxes — account for the largest source of revenue locally (see graph).
Then consider the contribution of the middle class to aggregate consumption, and the "bracket creep" that arises from an increase in income taxes without an increase in real income.
And factor in the extra costs middle-income earners incur — for education, medical aid, private security bills and above-inflation utility tariff increases — as a result of the gaps in services offered by the state.
SA’s short-term fiscal and debt position has been made easier by the commodities boom. But that has no structural benefit in terms of income tax collection. Meanwhile, on the expenditure front, the government continues to face growing calls to expand the social grant system, even though the civil servant wage bill and debt service costs together gobble up nearly 45% of government expenditure. Many of the state-owned entities (SOEs) that provide critical services to SA still face financial malaise and continue to burden the government’s balance sheet.
Which all means that longer-term risks to fiscal consolidation and debt sustainability — and to overburdened taxpayers — remain.
Over the years, a smaller proportion of taxpayers has become responsible for an increasingly larger share of personal income tax. With the tax base growing more slowly than the population, the level of dependency on this shrinking tax base remains high. Annual tax statistics from the SA Revenue Service and National Treasury show that 5.2-million assessed taxpayers supported 18.2-million social grant recipients in the 2020/2021 fiscal year.
What is to be done?
On the bright side, the government appears reluctant to raise taxes in the current tepid economic environment, following an increasing household tax burden from 2003 to 2019.
But to contain its fiscal deficit, it needs to improve its strategy to extract taxes. This includes addressing noncompliance and enforcing the criminal prosecution of felonious taxpayers.
Second, the state needs to target a higher level of spending efficiency. Matching civil servant pay increases with productivity could help curb the wage bill, while the government’s new investment company, formed to manage its stakes in SOEs, should pave the way for public-private partnerships and the consolidation or disposal of these entities, where necessary.
Finally, should fiscal policy become even more distributive in the future, the government will need to keep the economy humming with higher and more durable growth that enhances employment opportunities.
For this, it needs to concentrate its efforts on improving the inclusiveness of growth — in partnership with the private sector — by fostering upward economic mobility. It can do this by reducing costs in the network industry, removing excessive regulatory red tape and addressing the slide in governance that has weakened SA’s institutions.
Ultimately, such structural reforms will be the best way to broaden SA’s tax base and restore fiscal space, while also easing the unemployment and inequality quandary. It is through reform that the government can rescue SA from its low growth trap, and cultivate sustainability.
*Packirisamy is an economist at Momentum Investments
CLAIRE BISSEKER: Godongwana’s ‘Goldilocks budget’ too lukewarm for some
PETER BRUCE: Enoch Godongwana’s budget was inadequate
EDITORIAL: Godongwana uses lucky break smartly
XHANTI PAYI: New jobs don’t come cheap
DELPHINE GOVENDER: Corporate SA is losing trust in the government
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
STATE-OWNED ENTITIES: Turning off the money taps
Will public-private partnerships finally fly?
COLLECTED INCOME: Rocks on a roll for revenue
CORPORATE TAX: Cut will come, just not yet
SIN TAX: Going easy (kinda) on the sinners
TRANSFER DUTY: Property tax boom
PERSONAL INCOME TAX: Largesse … but just little
EDUCATION: For many, pit loos are to stay
SOCIAL GRANTS: A country leaning on welfare
MAMOKETE LIJANE: Why a basic income grant would doom poor South Africans to ...
The Eskom in the room
SECURITY, CRIME & COURTS: Corruption-busters get a lift
HEALTH: Squeeze on nurses, doctors
DINESH GOVENDER: Learning lessons from Covid
INFRASTRUCTURE: Far short of 2030 targets
TELECOMS: All quiet on the 4IR front
LOCAL AUTHORITIES: Good money after bad
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.