Sikonathi Mantshantsha’s column, "SA Airways in a nosedive" (Between the Chains, November 9-15), refers. It reminded me that stupidity is defined as repeating the same mistake but expecting a different outcome. That is exactly what the finance minister is doing by trying to keep SA Airways (SAA) airborne. In fact, the airline is so indebted it is not worth saving; it has little in the way of tangible assets; and most of the aircraft it uses are leased. Its other subsidiaries, Mango and SA Express, are competitors with different management structures and staff, and this has added to its liabilities. They should have been merged with the parent company, increasing efficiency and reducing administrative costs, yet this is now futile — bearing in mind that SAA’s liabilities exceed R30bn. The death knell was sounded back in 2012 when Cheryl Carolus, the competent chair of SAA, and six other respected board members resigned in protest because the then minister of public enterprises, Malus...
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Subscribe now to unlock this article.
Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).
There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.
Cancel anytime.
Questions? Email helpdesk@businesslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now.