Suppose a contract is set aside as invalid, what should be done about work completed as part of that contract and due for payment? This is the question at the heart of a new decision by the Supreme Court of Appeal.

The case concerns the Fetakgomo Tubatse local municipality, which concluded a three-year contract with Sekoko Mametja Attorneys. Under this deal, the firm was to deal with debt collection "as and when required"...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.