Given the legal and physical fighting over land and dispossession in Zimbabwe, it’s truly ironic that there is no overt constitutional right to shelter. That lack was brought home in a recent judgment of the Supreme Court, after it was asked to overturn a lower court decision against people in informal settlements outside Harare.

The group had "taken" a farm in 2000, at the "height of the land reform programme", as the court put it. A few years later, in 2005, all their structures were demolished by a government operation aimed at "clearing slums". The land where they were living was then "acquired by the state" and offered to developer Leengate...

BL Premium

This article is reserved for our subscribers.

A subscription helps you enjoy the best of our business content every day along with benefits such as articles from our international business news partners; ProfileData financial data; and digital access to the Sunday Times and Sunday Times Daily.

Already subscribed? Simply sign in below.

Questions or problems? Email or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now