There’s been a disconcerting development in the bitter disputes over Namibia’s new reinsurance laws: the supreme court’s after-the-event recusal of a senior judge who gave a crucial order in the matter without disclosing that he was involved in aspects of the dispute some years ago.

The judge also failed to disclose other significant information that, in the view of the three supreme court colleagues who heard the recusal matter, could reasonably have caused one party to suspect that it might not be treated fairly...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.