×

We've got news for you.

Register on BusinessLIVE at no cost to receive newsletters, read exclusive articles & more.
Register now

In a case certain to intrigue everyone in SA’s formal work space, a major labour union recently found itself in an unusual role — as an employer in dispute with a union organiser who challenged an alleged unfair labour practice. Even the labour court could not resist pointing out the irony of the National Union of Metalworkers of SA (Numsa) being "taken to task by one of its own employees". Acting judge Sean Snyman called it a case of the "shoe being on the other foot". The question for the court, he said, was whether Numsa’s conduct towards the employee would "[pass] muster as being fair". The dispute concerned a car-purchase scheme the union offered its employees as a benefit — subject to certain conditions. When local Numsa organiser Mandla Skhosana ignored these conditions, despite receiving reminders, the union suspended access to his vehicle and fuel allowance. Skhosana claimed he had been unfairly treated and felt so strongly about it that he took his grievance to the Commiss...

BL Premium

This article is reserved for our subscribers.

A subscription helps you enjoy the best of our business content every day along with benefits such as articles from our international business news partners; ProfileData financial data; and digital access to the Sunday Times and Sunday Times Daily.

Already subscribed? Simply sign in below.



Questions or problems? Email helpdesk@businesslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now

Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

Commenting is subject to our house rules.