At the time AB InBev was merging with SABMiller in Zambia, a dispute arose with the local securities and exchange commission, which oversees mergers. The breweries wanted to appeal a decision of the commission, but the body that should have heard the appeal did not exist: it had not been set up by the minister of finance even though it should have been in place long before. AB InBev and the other breweries — Zambian Breweries and National Breweries — then went to court against the attorney-general, the minister of finance and the commission. The legal team for the breweries outlined the history of the R1.4 trillion deal between AB InBev and SABMiller, which had triggered a mandatory offer to protect the minority shareholders of the Zambian brewery companies. AB InBev applied to the commission for exemption from making the mandatory offer. This was granted, with a fee being payable. The commission next demanded a "purported ‘authorisation fee’" in respect of the takeover transaction ...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.