The theory is that the strength of a country’s currency roughly reflects that nation’s "share price" — the relative value of, say, SA Inc. Of course, it’s far more nuanced than that, with all sorts of other factors influencing a currency’s strength. But it’s hard to argue with the fact that in the week of Jacob Zuma’s inauguration in May 2009, the rand was at R8.30/$, and today, nine years later, it is R14.86/$. It’s a telling and tangible indictment of the years of listless rule, of Nkandla, the Guptas and Eskom being pillaged, and a graphic reflection of how SA slipped down the investment rankings. It also shows why the downgrades from Moody’s, S&P Global Ratings and Fitch were inevitable. This week, a London-based company called Brand Finance published its "nation brands" index, a slightly offbeat but intriguing way of tracking the value of a country’s brand relative to others. As the researchers say, it shows the benefits of a strong brand, as well as the damage that can be caus...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.