In a remarkable U-turn, asset manager Coronation has begrudgingly done what its critics have been demanding: putting its contentious remuneration policy forward for a vote at its AGM on February 14. After being harangued by shareholder activist Theo Botha for two years (he even lodged an access to information request), its annual report released just after Christmas revealed that for the first time, shareholders will now get a "nonbinding advisory vote" on how it pays its staff. It’s not much, but it’s something — given that other firms on the JSE are expected to put their remuneration to a vote. Why should Coronation, which holds a hefty chunk of the JSE through the R599bn it invests for pension funds and others, not follow the same rules? If anything, it should set the example.Until now, Coronation has argued it shouldn’t have to put its policy to a vote, as this was set in stone back in 1993 when the company was founded. Chief investment officer Karl Leinberger told the Financial...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.