Vaping as a safe alternative to smoking. And other lies they told us

Smoking a cigarette on a plane was normal until tobacco control laws stopped it. 

The new normal is taking a puff on any of the latest electronic devices in a shopping centre where smoking isn’t allowed.

Big Tobacco is good at adapting. With fewer people smoking cigarettes globally, the industry has shifted focus towards electronic devices such as vapes and heated tobacco products (HTPs).

The World Health Organisation’s (WHO) Global Tobacco Epidemic report, which was released at the recent  World Conference on Tobacco Control in Dublin, shows how graphic warnings on packaging and anti-tobacco campaigns can fight against the tobacco industry influence machine, including these new product lines. 

It is a timely release for South Africa. Our own bill, meant to better regulate tobacco products, including new ones such as electronic delivery systems, is finally — nearly seven years after first being gazetted — before parliament’s health committee, hearing oral submissions from stakeholders. The WHO report highlights what we are up against.

Pages from the playbook

The report lays out how Big Tobacco’s well-honed tactics — and some new ones — are used to sell new products and keep legislation to slow down sales at bay.

Among these are co-opting the term harm reduction — an evidence-based way to help lower the effects of drug use or risky behaviours on someone’s health — to push the newer products as “safer alternatives” to traditional cigarettes.

From WHO Global Tobacco Epidemic report (2025)

The industry has also funded its own science to discredit independent research on its products, and pays media to publish sponsored articles, such as a November 24 TimesLIVE article, claiming electronic tobacco products are safe and effective harm-reduction tools, and a January News24 piece, boosting British American Tobacco-sponsored studies that underplay the potential harm of the chemicals contained in electronic products, says Lekan Ayo-Yusuf, public health expert at the University of Pretoria and WHO tobacco product regulation study group member.

The industry also exaggerates the size of the illicit market  to keep taxes low, arguing that if the government increases taxes on tobacco products, it will drive smuggling. It says plain packaging — which is what South Africa’s draft bill calls for — will also increase illicit trade, though the WHO says it can help with enforcement by making illicit products easier to detect. 

In many countries, illicit trade refers to counterfeit products or smuggled foreign cigarettes. But a 2023 study in the South African Crime Quarterly shows that in South Africa, it’s mainly legitimate domestic manufacturers that avoid paying proper taxes on branded cigarettes.

Ayo-Yusuf agrees: “It’s got nothing to do with tobacco legislation and everything to do with the criminal element in the industry.”

Where there’s smoke

E-cigarettes and vapes — electronic devices that heat a liquid containing additives and chemicals which are often flavoured in ways that appeal to children and adolescents — and HTPs, which electronically heat products that contain tobacco instead of burning it, are defined in our draft regulation as electronic delivery systems and tobacco devices. While some of the liquids don’t contain nicotine, many do, making them no less addictive than cigarettes. 

In fact, inhaling the aerosol from vapes can cause lung damage and heart problems, while HTPs still emit “tobacco smoke” with harmful chemicals — some at lower levels than cigarettes, others higher, and some not even found in cigarettes. 

Yet HTPs dodge tobacco rules in South Africa that bar the promotion of tobacco and public area smoking — even though they contain tobacco. 

“They’re violating the current tobacco laws in broad daylight,” says Ayo-Yusuf. “You cannot market or promote tobacco products. But you see people smoking in public places and you have whole HTP stores and stands in shopping malls.”

That’s what the bill aims to end. It proposes strict laws for newer devices: no use in public spaces; no advertising, online sales or claims that they’re less harmful than cigarettes; and regulations will require graphic health warnings as well as plain packaging to deter people from using them. If it is passed in its current form, it will also be the end of fruit-flavoured vapes — which have been heavily marketed to children — only tobacco and menthol flavours will be allowed. 

Bhekisisa spoke to Ayo-Yusuf about the growing market for heated tobacco, harm reduction and how regulation can keep pace. This is an edited version of our conversation.

Zano Kunene (ZK): How well does South Africa do in tobacco control?

Lekan Ayo-Yusuf (LAY): Not well, relative to other countries in Africa and globally. The bill is very good and will change the whole tobacco and nicotine control landscape, but we have been waiting [seven years for it]. Since it was introduced in 2018, we have seen the number of smokers grow from 9.5-million to 14.9-million in 2024.

ZK: Which smoking products are tobacco companies pushing in South Africa?

LAY: Vapes are a big one as we had 4.1% of people between 16 and 34 years old using [them] in 2018 and now we are sitting at 7.7%. Heated-tobacco use is also increasing, which I’ve been monitoring since 2021, and using data from Nielsen to pick up on which products are being sold.

ZK: What are HTPs and how do they differ from conventional cigarettes?

LAY: Traditional cigarettes burn tobacco so you can inhale nicotine, which makes the brain release dopamine and makes you feel good, but come with harmful chemicals from the tobacco and the paper. HTPs have a coil that is charged by a battery that heats a stick filled with tobacco leaves. The difference is that you do not have the chemicals that come from the burning process, otherwise you have everything else.

ZK: Why does the industry call them harm reduction tools?

LAY: The industry has jumped ahead to say they reduce harm, but what we actually know is it reduces exposure to harmful chemicals. In theory, they could lower harm over time, but it is not a linear process. Whether lowering toxins from 100 to 20, for example, is enough to reduce your harm from cardiovascular disease or cancer will take you a long time to find out.

The industry says it is targeting smokers who are trying to quit. The easiest evidence for this would be a drop in cigarette smoking. But since e-cigarettes entered the market in 2010, there is no evidence showing that smoking has reduced.

ZK: Are people swapping cigarettes for these products?

LAY: We are not seeing an exchange. Some people are actually smoking heated tobacco or vapes and cigarettes. There are also about 32% of people [between 16 and 34] who have never smoked but who are using e-cigarettes, an increase from  14% in 2018. 

This story was produced by the Bhekisisa Centre for Health Journalism. Sign up for the newsletter.