Executive pay can hit a nerve with investors — but recent developments suggest shareholder opinions can differ vastly on the stipend that is appropriate to directors. Last week poultry group Astral Foods — the epitome of a no-frills corporate culture — found itself in the invidious position of not being able to pay nonexecutive chair Theuns Eloff his R1.1m annual remuneration. Shareholders voted down the resolution at a general meeting. This was after shareholders voted against the special resolution around Eloff’s remuneration at an AGM in February this year. Eloff is largely viewed as a hard-working nonexecutive who has added value to Astral’s board. It is understood mainly offshore shareholders using a proxy vote service voted against the resolution. In stark contrast, shareholders in specialist retailer HomeChoice International overwhelmingly voted in favour of a nonbinding advisory vote on the company’s remuneration policy and its remuneration implementation report. The vote wa...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.