Education department warns new university is 'fraudulent'
Is it enough for a university operating in SA to be accredited in the US? SA’s higher education department emphatically says no
South Africans love a freebie as much as anyone, but when a "tuition-free" university hit our shores recently, it rubbed higher education authorities up the wrong way.
On the eve of the launch of the University of the People (UoPeople) in SA, the department of higher education & training issued a media alert warning that the "fraudulent university" was not registered with the department as required by law, and that it could find no evidence that it was accredited with the US education department. UoPeople did not have the authority to enrol students or grant degrees in SA, it said.
Department spokesman Madikwe Mabotha says there is no evidence that the online American university is accredited in SA, and whether or not it is registered with the US education department has no bearing on its accreditation status in SA.
But the local department’s warnings fell on deaf ears, as the launch of UoPeople was covered by television and newspapers across the country, highlighting the desperate demand for fee-free higher education.
UoPeople president Shai Reshef says the university is accredited by the Distance Education Accrediting Commission, an accreditation body that is approved by the US government. "University of the People has enrolled over 10,000 students from more than 200 countries. We are fully accredited in the US, and US higher education is generally well respected and recognised worldwide."
In this country, the SA Qualifications Authority (SAQA) registers qualifications against its National Qualifications Framework, while the Council on Higher Education (CHE) accredits learning programmes and submits qualifications to the qualifications authority for registration under the framework.
SAQA advocacy, communications & support director Wellington Radu says genuine qualifications can be issued by an education provider only if it is registered with one of three quality councils in SA: Umalusi, the Quality Council for Trades & Occupations, and the CHE.
Mergence Investment Managers equity analyst Nolwandle Mthombeni, who works with private education groups, says: "In the context of [SA], it isn’t a recognised institution."
Mabotha says fraudulent tertiary institutions are prevalent world wide. The problem is especially pronounced in the case of online distance learning companies.
"In this country, bogus operators hide behind so-called ‘international’ accreditation," he says.
Though the department has shut down many bogus colleges, some operators change their modus operandi once they are caught. Some, like the Academy for Sexology in Pretoria, take their courses online; others change their names.
UoPeople’s Reshef insists the institution is accredited in the US. "At this point we have not felt the need to pursue accreditation in any other country," he adds.
More than 400 local students have enrolled with UoPeople, even though some say it has not been transparent about its fee structure, as it is not completely cost free.
The university claims to have free programmes, but its steep processing fees mean it isn’t a cheaper education platform. UoPeople charges a nonrefundable US$60 "processing fee". It also charges $100 for each exam and $200 for an MBA exam.
The average undergraduate student in SA has four exams per semester. Using this average, UoPeople’s cost per semester is actually more than R5,000, and this doubles for MBA students.
Reshef says these "modest fees" ensure that the university remains sustainable.
A registered student told the Financial Mail he is happy to have found an internationally recognised institution to further his studies. Registering was simple, he says, but little contact support is offered and students have to grapple with material on their own.
Another student says the model allows her to work full-time and study in between.