We've got news for you.

Register on BusinessLIVE at no cost to receive newsletters, read exclusive articles & more.
Register now

Goldman Sachs is pulling out of working with most special purpose acquisition companies (Spacs) it took public, spooked by new liability guidelines from regulators and throwing into doubt the fate of billions raised for those blank-cheque vehicles.

The Wall Street giant, the second-biggest underwriter of Spacs in 2021, has been telling sponsors of the vehicles it will be ending its involvement, according to people with knowledge of the matter. The bank is also electing to pause new US Spac issuance for now, one of the people said.

A pac works with its adviser even after going public to complete its merger with a target firm, known as the de-Spac transaction. If it fails to complete that deal, it’s forced to return capital to investors. In cases where the public company is very close to completing the de-Spac process, Goldman will fulfil its role, two of the people said.

Goldman may also elect to continue the advisory work with a small number of Spac clients in rare cases. Other sponsors will need to seek new advisers to take over the role vacated by the bank.

Spacs were the hottest toy on Wall Street over the past couple of years, drawing financiers, politicians and celebrities, who were able to make easy millions from investors piling into the investment vehicles. Spacs, or blank-cheque firms, list on public stock exchanges to raise money so they can buy other companies. New guidelines from the Securities and Exchange Commission have helped put an end to the party.

The SEC has embraced a sweeping plan for tightening oversight of Spacs including exposing underwriters to greater liability risk. US legislators and investor advocates have argued the listings were bypassing rules imposed on traditional initial public offerings and exposing retail shareholders to extra risks. The SEC’s proposal would require Spacs to disclose more information about potential conflicts of interest and make it easier for investors to sue over false projections.

“We are reducing our involvement in the Spac business in response to the changed regulatory environment,” said Maeve DuVally, a spokesperson for New York-based Goldman Sachs. The policy could change if the SEC guidelines are scaled back. 

The SEC has deemed the underwriters of a blank-cheque offering to also be underwriters of the Spac’s subsequent purchase of a target firm. Prominent law firms have cautioned that the expansion of underwriter liability to include de-Spacs carries greater risk for investment banks.

“Investment banks involved with de-Spac transactions do not typically conduct the same level of due diligence as they would for a traditional initial public offerings (IPO),” lawyers from Sidley Austin wrote in a memo to clients.

Even before the SEC crackdown, souring markets, agitated regulators and the plunging stock of prominent companies that went public by merging with blank-cheque firms had cast a chill on the market.

If Goldman’s decision is followed by peers, that could hurt investment vehicles that have already gone public and are on the hunt for a takeover target. It’s unusual for a bank to withdraw from an active blank-cheque firm because it typically works on the de-Spac as well. The move risks leaving the sponsor of the Spac — its client — in the lurch and unhappy.

In many cases, those same sponsors were courted by large banks to put their names behind their Spacs, with the structure allowing them to turn an initial investment of a few million dollars into many multiples of that. And their Wall Street underwriters could make more than 5% in fees for taking a Spac public, helping the sponsor find a takeover target and complete the de-Spac.

Goldman is bracing for pressure to be exerted by angry clients, who had put up their own capital to get their Spacs off the ground and are still eager to find takeover targets and complete their mergers, one of the people said.

Citigroup has already paused IPOs of new US Spacs until it gets more clarity on potential legal risks, Bloomberg News reported in April. Citigroup was the largest underwriter of US blank-cheque firms in 2021, when $93bn was raised in Spac offerings, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Bloomberg News. More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com


Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.