Negotiators trade barbs at fraught Iran nuclear talks
Iran's chief negotiator accuses European and US diplomats of playing ‘blame game’ in Vienna
Stern warnings from US and European officials suggest the window is closing on nuclear talks with Iran, with frustration boiling over after two weeks of negotiations marred by allegations of Iranian backsliding.
Secretary of state Antony Blinken suggested that the US could soon shift its attention away from attempting to resurrect the 2015 accord that had capped Iran’s nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief.
“We are actively engaging with partners and allies on alternatives,” Blinken told journalists on Tuesday in Jakarta. Diplomats from France, Germany and the UK who are negotiating with Iran warned the agreement “will very soon become an empty shell”, according to a rare statement emailed late on Monday from Vienna, where the talks are taking place.
The Islamic Republic’s chief negotiator, Ali Bagheri Kani, accused European and US diplomats of playing a “blame game” in Vienna. He said a “good agreement” could be swiftly reached if they agreed to compensate Iran for the Trump administration’s decision to exit the nuclear deal three years ago.
But concern is deepening as talks stall while Iran continues to accelerate its nuclear programme, as well as placing restrictions on International Atomic Energy Agency monitors.
Tehran’s top nuclear official, Mohammad Eslami, told state-run television on Tuesday that inspectors won’t be allowed back into a workshop for centrifuges. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) monitors have reported thousands of the new machines are being readied to separate uranium isotopes, signalling another significant expansion in enrichment capacity if diplomacy fails.
Iran stepped up its atomic work in 2019 in response to Trump’s efforts to derail the accord and reimpose punishing sanctions on the country’s economy.
It has enriched uranium to 60% levels, close to what’s needed to make nuclear weapons. Iran says it has no intention of building warheads but concerns it might try drove the diplomacy that culminated in the 2015 accord.
Given those fears, the stalemate in the Austrian capital could soon radiate out to the Middle East, leading to more saber rattling among nations concerned by Iran’s atomic activities, especially Israel. Energy markets are also closely watching the talks for signs of when the holder of the world’s No 2 gas and No 4 oil reserves might return to global markets.
Among the most contentious Iranian positions in Vienna is the insistence that its engineers be allowed to continue using some advanced centrifuges that were not permitted under the original pact.
Tehran’s government is also seeking broader respite from sanctions than the US is prepared to give, as well as guarantees that future White House administrations won’t again scuttle the accord.
Disappointment, worry and urgency were the words chosen to describe the stalemate by a person familiar with discussions between EU foreign ministers on Monday in Brussels. EU shuttle diplomacy between Iranian foreign minister Hossein Amirabdollahian and Blinken have so far failed to bridge differences.
“Time is running out” given “Iran’s fast-forwarding of its nuclear programme”, wrote European diplomats.
The US said last week that Iran could face fresh sanctions if negotiations fail and the Islamic Republic could be censured at the IAEA over its lack of co-operation with inspectors. While such a resolution of censure would be mostly symbolic, diplomats involved in the Vienna talks have the option to pursue more aggressive actions resulting in greater escalation.
European nations still active in 2015 accord could refer Iran back to the UN Security Council, where broader international sanctions could be snapped back. Iran has warned such a move could lead it to exit the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, curtailing international monitoring altogether.
Bloomberg News. More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
US secretary of state Antony Blinken speaks in Jakarta about America's policy on the Indo-Pacific and the geopolitical issues in the region.
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.