Israel angry as EU court rules its goods must say ‘produced in occupied territory’
Israel points out that the court has not rendered one other similar ruling in the more-than 200 ongoing territorial disputes across the world
Brussels — The EU’s top court ruled on Tuesday that goods from Israeli settlements must be labeled as produced in “occupied territory”, a decision hailed by Palestinians and condemned by Israel, which said it will try to persuade countries to ignore it.
The Luxembourg-based European Court of Justice said labels must not imply that goods produced in occupied territory come from Israel itself.
Labels must “prevent consumers from being misled as to the fact that the state of Israel is present in the territories concerned as an occupying power and not as a sovereign entity”, the court said.
The case focused on a winery in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, but the court referred to all territory Israel captured in the 1967 war, including East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights, both of which Israel has annexed, as well as the West Bank.
As well as wine, Israeli farmers grow and package herbs, fruits and vegetables in the territories, many of which have been exported to the EU and labelled “Product of Israel”.
Israel’s foreign ministry said it “strongly rejects” the ruling “which serves as a tool in the political campaign against Israel”. Foreign minister Israel Katz said he will work with foreign ministers of EU countries to prevent its implementation.
“The ruling’s entire objective is to single out and apply a double standard against Israel. There are more than 200 ongoing territorial disputes across the world, yet the [court] has not rendered a single ruling related to the labeling of products originating from these territories,” the ministry said.
Saeb Erekat, the Palestinian chief negotiator, welcomed the ruling and called on all EU countries to “implement what is a legal and political obligation”.
Palestinians want to establish a state on territory occupied by Israel since 1967. They argue that settlements on occupied land are an unlawful violation of the Geneva conventions and multiple UN resolutions. Israel denies that its settlements break international law.
In its ruling, the EU court said settlements involved the transfer of Israelis outside the state’s territory “in violation of the rules of general international humanitarian law”.
As a result, failing to inform EU consumers they were potentially buying goods produced in settlements denies them access to “ethical considerations and considerations relating to the observance of international law”.
Human Rights Watch, which monitors Israel’s activities in the occupied territories, said the court decision was an important step towards EU member states not participating “in the fiction that illegal settlements are part of Israel”.
“European consumers are entitled to be confident that the products they purchase are not linked to serious violations of international humanitarian law.”