Reeves aims to back UK lenders in vehicle financing case
Treasury is worried that a court judgment, if allowed to stand on appeal, would make it hard for consumers to get car loans
21 January 2025 - 16:38
bySachin Ravikumar and SINEAD CRUISE
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Britain's Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves. Picture: FLORENCE LO/REUTERS
London — British finance minister Rachel Reeves is seeking to intervene in a landmark car loan mis-selling case in an effort to shield the motor finance industry as it faces a potential multi-billion pound payout to consumers.
Britain’s Treasury is worried that a court judgment handed down in October, if allowed to stand on appeal, would make it hard for consumers to get car loans. About 80% of new vehicles in the UK are bought on finance.
It said on Tuesday it would express its concerns in an upcoming Supreme Court appeal brought by lenders against the earlier Court of Appeal ruling that it was unlawful for car dealers to receive a commission from banks providing motor finance without obtaining the customer’s informed consent.
Shares in Close Brothers and Lloyds jumped on Tuesday after the Financial Times first reported the Treasury’s bid to intervene, with Close rising 20% and Lloyds gaining 4.3%.
“We want to see a fair and proportionate judgment that ensures compensation to consumers that is proportionate to the losses they have suffered, and allows the motor finance sector to continue playing its role in supporting millions of motorists to own vehicles,” a Treasury spokesperson said in a statement.
Analysts had earlier estimated banks could face a £16bn compensation bill, making it one of the sector’s most costly consumer compliance failures.
The Treasury will argue that the uncertainty caused by the judgment could undermine confidence in UK financial regulation.
“It is a potentially bad look for the UK if lenders who did not breach statutory law and followed the regulatory rules on disclosure could face a retrospective liability,” analysts at Jefferies said in a note.
The UK arm of Spain’s Banco Santander had set aside £295m to cover possible costs related to an ongoing regulatory review into charging by car finance lenders.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Reeves aims to back UK lenders in vehicle financing case
Treasury is worried that a court judgment, if allowed to stand on appeal, would make it hard for consumers to get car loans
London — British finance minister Rachel Reeves is seeking to intervene in a landmark car loan mis-selling case in an effort to shield the motor finance industry as it faces a potential multi-billion pound payout to consumers.
Britain’s Treasury is worried that a court judgment handed down in October, if allowed to stand on appeal, would make it hard for consumers to get car loans. About 80% of new vehicles in the UK are bought on finance.
It said on Tuesday it would express its concerns in an upcoming Supreme Court appeal brought by lenders against the earlier Court of Appeal ruling that it was unlawful for car dealers to receive a commission from banks providing motor finance without obtaining the customer’s informed consent.
Shares in Close Brothers and Lloyds jumped on Tuesday after the Financial Times first reported the Treasury’s bid to intervene, with Close rising 20% and Lloyds gaining 4.3%.
“We want to see a fair and proportionate judgment that ensures compensation to consumers that is proportionate to the losses they have suffered, and allows the motor finance sector to continue playing its role in supporting millions of motorists to own vehicles,” a Treasury spokesperson said in a statement.
Analysts had earlier estimated banks could face a £16bn compensation bill, making it one of the sector’s most costly consumer compliance failures.
The Treasury will argue that the uncertainty caused by the judgment could undermine confidence in UK financial regulation.
“It is a potentially bad look for the UK if lenders who did not breach statutory law and followed the regulatory rules on disclosure could face a retrospective liability,” analysts at Jefferies said in a note.
The UK arm of Spain’s Banco Santander had set aside £295m to cover possible costs related to an ongoing regulatory review into charging by car finance lenders.
SA’s FirstRand and Investec had also raised provisions in respect of the probe.
Lloyds has also set aside a £450m provision to cover possible redress.
Reuters
Generali, BPCE in move to create Europe’s biggest asset manager
BlackRock agrees to new ESG disclosure requirements
Top Canadian banks join exodus from climate coalition
Morgan Stanley more than doubles fourth-quarter profit
‘We shook empires’: Hindenburg Research founder shuts short-seller firm
China’s second-largest fund manager aims to enter US and Brazil, CEO says
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Generali, BPCE in move to create Europe’s biggest asset manager
BlackRock agrees to new ESG disclosure requirements
Top Canadian banks join exodus from climate coalition
Morgan Stanley more than doubles fourth-quarter profit
‘We shook empires’: Hindenburg Research founder shuts short-seller firm
China’s second-largest fund manager aims to enter US and Brazil, CEO says
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.