Inquiry blames firms and UK government for Grenfell Tower fire deaths
Most responsibility for the disaster laid on the companies involved in the maintenance and refit of the apartment tower
04 September 2024 - 14:57
byMichael Holden and Catarina Demony
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
The covered remains of Grenfell Tower are seen on the day of the publication of the second report of the UK public inquiry into the deadly 2017 Grenfell fire, in London, Britain, on September 4 2024. Picture: TOBY MELVILLE/REUTERS
London — A public inquiry into the devastating 2017 London Grenfell Tower blaze on Wednesday blamed the disaster on failings by the government, construction industry and, most of all, the firms involved in fitting the exterior with flammable cladding.
Seventy-two people died when the fire ripped through the 23-storey social housing block in one of the richest areas of west London during the early hours of June 14, 2017. It was Britain’s deadliest blaze in a residential building since World War 2.
“The simple truth is that the deaths that occurred were all avoidable,” said inquiry chair Martin Moore-Bick.
In its long-awaited final report, the inquiry laid most responsibility for the disaster on the companies involved in the maintenance and refit of the apartment tower, failings by local and national authorities as well as companies that had dishonestly marketed combustible cladding materials as safe.
There was also widespread criticism and blame levelled at the then-government, local authority of Kensington and Chelsea, the industry, regulatory groups, specific individuals and an ill-prepared fire brigade for years of inaction over fire safety in high-rise blocks.
“Not all of them bear the same degree of responsibility for the eventual disaster, but as our reports show, all contributed to it in one way or another, in most cases, through incompetence, but in some cases, through dishonesty and greed,” Moore-Bick said.
The inquiry report, which runs to almost 1,700 pages, reads the blaze was the culmination of “decades of failure”. In the years since the inferno, survivors and relatives of those who perished have demanded those responsible should face criminal charges.
“The duty of government should be to safeguard life, while protecting us from corporate greed,” said Grenfell United, a group representing some survivors and bereaved families.
No repeat
“But for too long, they have aided corporations, facilitating them to profit and dictate regulation.” While British police have said 58 people and 19 firms and organisations are under investigation, prosecutions — including for corporate manslaughter and fraud — remain years away due to the complexity and need to consider the inquiry’s report.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the government would carefully consider the inquiry’s findings to ensure there was no repeat of the disaster.
An earlier report by the inquiry team in 2019, which focused on the events of the night, found an electrical fault in a refrigerator in a fourth floor apartment started the fire.
Flames then spread uncontrollably, mainly because the tower had been covered during a 2016 refurbishment with cladding — exterior panels designed to improve appearance and add insulation — made of flammable aluminium composite material that acted as a source of fuel.
The harrowing accounts, including from those who perished while awaiting rescuers and having followed official guidance to stay put, prompted fury and national soul-searching over building standards and the treatment of low-income communities.
The inquiry, headed by retired judge Martin Moore-Bick, found a litany of failings; lessons had not been learnt from past high-rise tower blazes and testing systems were inadequate.
The most overt blame was laid at the feet of those involved in the refurbishment of the tower with the flammable cladding. The inquiry said architect Studio E, principal contractor Rydon, and cladding subcontractor Harley all bore considerable responsibility for the disaster.
Heavily criticised
Fire safety inspectors Exova were also blamed for the building being left “in a dangerous condition on completion of the refurbishment”.
Kensington and Chelsea council and the Tenant Management Organisation (TMO), which managed the local authority’s housing stock, were also heavily criticised.
They had shown indifference to fire safety regulations in the years before the blaze and the TMO, whose difficult relationship with some residents was said to have created a “toxic atmosphere”, had been unduly focused on cutting costs.
While the local community and voluntary groups were praised for providing support, the council was also criticised for its slow, muddled and “wholly inadequate” response to the incident.
There was also condemnation of those firms that made and sold the cladding or its foam insulation — Celotex, Kingspan, and Arconic Architectural Products, the French subsidiary of US company Arconic. The inquiry concluded there had been “systematic dishonesty” on their part.
“They engaged in deliberate and sustained strategies to manipulate the testing processes, misrepresent tested data and mislead the market,” the report said.
Arconic said it rejected any claim it had sold an unsafe product or tried to conceal information about tests of its materials.
Kingspan said it had “long acknowledged the wholly unacceptable historical failings” but said these were not causative of the tragedy.
The issue of exterior cladding has raised concerns across Europe where there have been similar blazes in apartment blocks such as in the Spanish city of Valencia in February, and in Italy in 2021.
In Britain, government figures from July showed 3,280 buildings standing at 11m or higher still had unsafe cladding, with remediation work yet to start on more than two-thirds of them.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Inquiry blames firms and UK government for Grenfell Tower fire deaths
Most responsibility for the disaster laid on the companies involved in the maintenance and refit of the apartment tower
London — A public inquiry into the devastating 2017 London Grenfell Tower blaze on Wednesday blamed the disaster on failings by the government, construction industry and, most of all, the firms involved in fitting the exterior with flammable cladding.
Seventy-two people died when the fire ripped through the 23-storey social housing block in one of the richest areas of west London during the early hours of June 14, 2017. It was Britain’s deadliest blaze in a residential building since World War 2.
“The simple truth is that the deaths that occurred were all avoidable,” said inquiry chair Martin Moore-Bick.
In its long-awaited final report, the inquiry laid most responsibility for the disaster on the companies involved in the maintenance and refit of the apartment tower, failings by local and national authorities as well as companies that had dishonestly marketed combustible cladding materials as safe.
There was also widespread criticism and blame levelled at the then-government, local authority of Kensington and Chelsea, the industry, regulatory groups, specific individuals and an ill-prepared fire brigade for years of inaction over fire safety in high-rise blocks.
“Not all of them bear the same degree of responsibility for the eventual disaster, but as our reports show, all contributed to it in one way or another, in most cases, through incompetence, but in some cases, through dishonesty and greed,” Moore-Bick said.
The inquiry report, which runs to almost 1,700 pages, reads the blaze was the culmination of “decades of failure”. In the years since the inferno, survivors and relatives of those who perished have demanded those responsible should face criminal charges.
“The duty of government should be to safeguard life, while protecting us from corporate greed,” said Grenfell United, a group representing some survivors and bereaved families.
No repeat
“But for too long, they have aided corporations, facilitating them to profit and dictate regulation.” While British police have said 58 people and 19 firms and organisations are under investigation, prosecutions — including for corporate manslaughter and fraud — remain years away due to the complexity and need to consider the inquiry’s report.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the government would carefully consider the inquiry’s findings to ensure there was no repeat of the disaster.
An earlier report by the inquiry team in 2019, which focused on the events of the night, found an electrical fault in a refrigerator in a fourth floor apartment started the fire.
Flames then spread uncontrollably, mainly because the tower had been covered during a 2016 refurbishment with cladding — exterior panels designed to improve appearance and add insulation — made of flammable aluminium composite material that acted as a source of fuel.
The harrowing accounts, including from those who perished while awaiting rescuers and having followed official guidance to stay put, prompted fury and national soul-searching over building standards and the treatment of low-income communities.
The inquiry, headed by retired judge Martin Moore-Bick, found a litany of failings; lessons had not been learnt from past high-rise tower blazes and testing systems were inadequate.
The most overt blame was laid at the feet of those involved in the refurbishment of the tower with the flammable cladding. The inquiry said architect Studio E, principal contractor Rydon, and cladding subcontractor Harley all bore considerable responsibility for the disaster.
Heavily criticised
Fire safety inspectors Exova were also blamed for the building being left “in a dangerous condition on completion of the refurbishment”.
Kensington and Chelsea council and the Tenant Management Organisation (TMO), which managed the local authority’s housing stock, were also heavily criticised.
They had shown indifference to fire safety regulations in the years before the blaze and the TMO, whose difficult relationship with some residents was said to have created a “toxic atmosphere”, had been unduly focused on cutting costs.
While the local community and voluntary groups were praised for providing support, the council was also criticised for its slow, muddled and “wholly inadequate” response to the incident.
There was also condemnation of those firms that made and sold the cladding or its foam insulation — Celotex, Kingspan, and Arconic Architectural Products, the French subsidiary of US company Arconic. The inquiry concluded there had been “systematic dishonesty” on their part.
“They engaged in deliberate and sustained strategies to manipulate the testing processes, misrepresent tested data and mislead the market,” the report said.
Arconic said it rejected any claim it had sold an unsafe product or tried to conceal information about tests of its materials.
Kingspan said it had “long acknowledged the wholly unacceptable historical failings” but said these were not causative of the tragedy.
The issue of exterior cladding has raised concerns across Europe where there have been similar blazes in apartment blocks such as in the Spanish city of Valencia in February, and in Italy in 2021.
In Britain, government figures from July showed 3,280 buildings standing at 11m or higher still had unsafe cladding, with remediation work yet to start on more than two-thirds of them.
Reuters
UK housebuilders face potential £15bn bill to make homes safe
Mayor of London declares major incident as hospitals are overwhelmed
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Five books to read in September
MIA SWART: The things we lost in the fire
UK housebuilders face potential £15bn bill to make homes safe
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.