Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
People take part in a rally calling on members to pass a nature restoration law, near the European Parliament, in Strasbourg, France in this July 11 2023 file image obtained from social media. Picture: GREENS/EFA GROUP via REUTERS
Brussels — The European parliament on Wednesday voted to pass a fiercely contested law to restore degraded natural ecosystems in the continent, salvaging the environmental measures that centre-right legislators had campaigned to kill off.
The legal proposal was adopted with 336 votes in favour, 300 against, and 13 abstentions. EU legislators and member countries will now negotiate the final text, aiming for a deal before EU parliament elections in 2024.
The decision comes after months of political campaigning that exposed deep divisions among EU countries and legislators over the proposal. It has prompted some government leaders to warn that Europe is pushing through too many environmental laws as part of its overall green agenda.
The flagship EU nature law will require countries to introduce measures restoring nature on a fifth of their land and sea by 2030. The aim is to reverse the decline of Europe’s natural habitats, 81% of which are classed as being in poor health.
“Restoring nature brings numerous benefits to farmers such as revitalising soils, supporting pollinators and buffering them from the worsening effects of climate change. It is as simple as this: we cannot grow food on dead soil,” EU legislators Mohammed Chahim said after the vote.
The European People’s Party (EPP), the EU parliament’s biggest legislators group, led a campaign to reject the plan on the grounds it would harm farmers and endanger food security. That is despite Ursula von der Leyen, the head of the European Commission, which proposed the nature law, being from the EPP party.
“We fear that this law will be counterproductive and have significant social and economic consequences,” the EPP group said in a tweet.
Other legislators and scientists have rejected the EPP’s claims, accusing the group of using misinformation to court votes ahead of EU parliament elections in 2024. The group denies this.
Cesar Luena, the parliament’s lead negotiator, thanked the scientists and young people who had supported the law — among them, Swedish activist Greta Thunberg, who attended the EU assembly on Wednesday to watch the vote.
Brussels has already passed dozens of carbon dioxide-cutting laws to deliver the EU’s overall green agenda, including its goal to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.
But environment proposals have hit resistance — particularly those that would require changes from farmers, to tackle environmental pollution and the collapse of bee and butterfly populations. EU legislators voted earlier this week to weaken another law to cut pollution from farms.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Nature law scrapes through EU parliament
Brussels — The European parliament on Wednesday voted to pass a fiercely contested law to restore degraded natural ecosystems in the continent, salvaging the environmental measures that centre-right legislators had campaigned to kill off.
The legal proposal was adopted with 336 votes in favour, 300 against, and 13 abstentions. EU legislators and member countries will now negotiate the final text, aiming for a deal before EU parliament elections in 2024.
The decision comes after months of political campaigning that exposed deep divisions among EU countries and legislators over the proposal. It has prompted some government leaders to warn that Europe is pushing through too many environmental laws as part of its overall green agenda.
The flagship EU nature law will require countries to introduce measures restoring nature on a fifth of their land and sea by 2030. The aim is to reverse the decline of Europe’s natural habitats, 81% of which are classed as being in poor health.
“Restoring nature brings numerous benefits to farmers such as revitalising soils, supporting pollinators and buffering them from the worsening effects of climate change. It is as simple as this: we cannot grow food on dead soil,” EU legislators Mohammed Chahim said after the vote.
The European People’s Party (EPP), the EU parliament’s biggest legislators group, led a campaign to reject the plan on the grounds it would harm farmers and endanger food security. That is despite Ursula von der Leyen, the head of the European Commission, which proposed the nature law, being from the EPP party.
“We fear that this law will be counterproductive and have significant social and economic consequences,” the EPP group said in a tweet.
Other legislators and scientists have rejected the EPP’s claims, accusing the group of using misinformation to court votes ahead of EU parliament elections in 2024. The group denies this.
Cesar Luena, the parliament’s lead negotiator, thanked the scientists and young people who had supported the law — among them, Swedish activist Greta Thunberg, who attended the EU assembly on Wednesday to watch the vote.
Brussels has already passed dozens of carbon dioxide-cutting laws to deliver the EU’s overall green agenda, including its goal to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.
But environment proposals have hit resistance — particularly those that would require changes from farmers, to tackle environmental pollution and the collapse of bee and butterfly populations. EU legislators voted earlier this week to weaken another law to cut pollution from farms.
Reuters
DBSA partners with Green Climate Fund to boost water security
Ninety One and Standard Bank CEOs named in World Bank Investment Lab
The women creating green jobs in Arab countries
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Nepal’s trees grow best with women in charge of forests
Biden’s green hydrogen plan has a water problem
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.