Norwegian wealth fund puts Malaysia’s Supermax Corp under observation
Major investor wants medical glove maker to do more to improve living and working conditions for migrant workers
Norway’s $1.2-trillion wealth fund has put Malaysian medical glove maker Supermax Corp under observation for two years, citing allegations that the company contributes to serious violations of human rights.
Supermax will have to show it is addressing changes the fund wants to see over the two years or the fund may sell its holding in the company.
“The executive board has made the assessment that the company’s announced measures to improve living and working conditions for migrant workers leave uncertainty about future developments,” the fund said in a statement issued late on Wednesday.
Asked by Reuters for a comment on the Norway fund’s action, a Supermax spokesperson referred to its statement from June 2, which said the company is trying to align its human resource practices with International Labour Organisation (ILO) standards and expectations of international regulatory bodies.
The glove maker said in the June 2 statement it had rolled out a new foreign worker management policy, which included upgrading workers’ quarters and remediating migrant workers who had paid recruitment fees.
Supermax has faced an import ban by the US customs service since October due to allegations of forced labour at its operations, and in January Canada terminated its sourcing contract with the company after the allegations.
The Norway fund also said it had revoked a 2015 exclusion of Malaysia’s IJM Corp.
IJM Corp was excluded in 2015 due to its activities in palm oil plants in Indonesia, and since these activities have been terminated there are no longer grounds for exclusion, the fund said.
IJM told Reuters in an email on Thursday that the wealth fund’s decision to remove the company from its exclusion list was “in line with the divestment of IJM Plantations Berhad in September 2021”.
Norway’s wealth fund operates under ethical guidelines set by parliament and excludes companies from its investments that it says do not respect them.
The fund said it had also decided to end its “active ownership” for SA’s AngloGold Ashanti.
AngloGold Ashanti has been under special active ownership since 2013 due to allegations of serious environmental damage and violations of human rights related to activities in two gold mines in Ghana.
Active ownership means that management of the fund, as opposed to its ethics watchdog, will engage in a dialogue with the company on issues raised.
“The executive board now finds that the risk in terms of future developments appear to have been reduced,” it said. In future there will be follow-up through usual ownership activity.
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.