Plaintiffs tell European human rights court the country’s drilling is a threat to their future
15 June 2021 - 11:31
byNerijus Adomaitis
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Greenpeace protesters shut down a Shell petrol station during the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos. Picture: REUTERS
Oslo — Norwegian climate activists have asked the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) to rule against the country’s plans for more oil drilling in the Arctic, arguing that its exploration deprives young people of their future.
The lawsuit, by six individuals aged between 20 and 27 as well as Greenpeace and Young Friends of the Earth, is part of an emerging branch of law worldwide where plaintiffs go to court to make the case for curbing emissions that cause climate change.
In the Netherlands, a court recently ordered Shell to cut its emissions in a lawsuit brought by citizens who argued that the Anglo-Dutch oil company violated their human rights.
“The environmentalists argue that, by allowing new oil drilling in the midst of a climate crisis, Norway is in breach of fundamental human rights”” the campaigners said in a statement.
Three courts in Norway have previously ruled in favour of the government, however, including in a verdict by the supreme court last December, thus exhausting domestic legal options.
“We have to take action now to limit irreversible damage to our climate and ecosystems to ensure livelihoods for the coming generations,” said Ella Marie Haetta Isaksen, 23, one of the activists who asked the ECHR to take up the Norwegian case.
Lasse Eriksen Bjoern, 24, an activist from the indigenous Sami people of northern Norway, said climate change was already endangering a way of life.
“The Sami culture is closely related to the use of nature, and fisheries are essential,” he said. “A threat to our oceans is a threat to our people.”
The ECHR’s rules require applicants to be directly and personally affected by alleged violations, while its judgments are binding for the countries concerned.
The court must now decide whether the case, billed by the activists as “the People vs. Arctic Oil”, is admissible.
Norway, Western Europe’s largest oil and gas producer with a daily output of about 4m bbl of oil equivalent, said last week it planned to continue current petroleum policies.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Climate activists target Norway’s Arctic oil plans
Plaintiffs tell European human rights court the country’s drilling is a threat to their future
Oslo — Norwegian climate activists have asked the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) to rule against the country’s plans for more oil drilling in the Arctic, arguing that its exploration deprives young people of their future.
The lawsuit, by six individuals aged between 20 and 27 as well as Greenpeace and Young Friends of the Earth, is part of an emerging branch of law worldwide where plaintiffs go to court to make the case for curbing emissions that cause climate change.
In the Netherlands, a court recently ordered Shell to cut its emissions in a lawsuit brought by citizens who argued that the Anglo-Dutch oil company violated their human rights.
“The environmentalists argue that, by allowing new oil drilling in the midst of a climate crisis, Norway is in breach of fundamental human rights”” the campaigners said in a statement.
Three courts in Norway have previously ruled in favour of the government, however, including in a verdict by the supreme court last December, thus exhausting domestic legal options.
“We have to take action now to limit irreversible damage to our climate and ecosystems to ensure livelihoods for the coming generations,” said Ella Marie Haetta Isaksen, 23, one of the activists who asked the ECHR to take up the Norwegian case.
Lasse Eriksen Bjoern, 24, an activist from the indigenous Sami people of northern Norway, said climate change was already endangering a way of life.
“The Sami culture is closely related to the use of nature, and fisheries are essential,” he said. “A threat to our oceans is a threat to our people.”
The ECHR’s rules require applicants to be directly and personally affected by alleged violations, while its judgments are binding for the countries concerned.
The court must now decide whether the case, billed by the activists as “the People vs. Arctic Oil”, is admissible.
Norway, Western Europe’s largest oil and gas producer with a daily output of about 4m bbl of oil equivalent, said last week it planned to continue current petroleum policies.
Reuters
EDITORIAL: Greenwashing and all its dirty laundry
CAROL PATON: A sparkling new moment of opportunity
President Joe Biden’s engagement may help break the Northern Ireland impasse
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
DESNÉ MASIE: Zero-waste outfits a dubious offset for Johnson’s penchant for ...
Is the government working in its own interest?
PETER ATTARD MONTALTO: Something clicked with Ramaphosa’s power-generation move
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.