EU to vote on IMF candidate on Friday morning
The vote has been delayed to 8am Brussels time to allow the UK to put forward a new candidate in the light of the recent change in its government
Brussels — EU finance ministers will vote on Friday morning on who should take over the top job at the International Monetary Fund (IMF), as the bloc seeks to break an internal deadlock and avoid losing a post that traditionally is held by one of its own.
The vote was delayed until 8am Brussels time on Friday to allow the UK to put forward a new candidate in the light of the recent change in its government, according to a statement from the French finance ministry and EU officials. There may be several rounds to the ballot, which will be done by qualified majority, which takes into consideration countries’ populations.
EU governments have so far failed to rally behind a single candidate to replace Christine Lagarde atop the Washington-based IMF, and the frustration has become palpable across capitals. The Washington-based fund will stop accepting applications on September 6 and is seeking to complete the process by October 4.
The European search, led by French finance minister Bruno Le Maire, has so far tested the support for five candidates: Spanish economy minister Nadia Calvino, Portuguese finance minister Mario Centeno, former Dutch finance minister Jeroen Dijsselbloem, World Bank CEO Kristalina Georgieva and Bank of Finland governor Olli Rehn.
Despite the fact that there are five names in the running, Calvino and Centeno are long shots as they are seen as not having the same level of expertise as the other candidates, according to a European official, who asked not to be identified because the deliberations are private.
The French finance ministry said none of the five wished to withdraw their candidacy and all were judged “legitimate and of excellent quality”.
The top vacancy comes after Lagarde resigned in July to lead the European Central Bank. The IMF’s next leader will confront a world economy at its weakest since the aftermath of the financial crisis. Last week, the fund further reduced its global growth outlook, already the lowest since 2009, to a projected 3.2% expansion this year.
Yet Europe has struggled to rally behind a single candidate, with geographic and political considerations deepening the divisions between camps pushing for different hopefuls. Growing frustration over the decision-making process — especially from countries whose nationals are being considered — has weighed on the talks.
There are practical issues, too. If Georgieva gets the EU’s nod, the bloc would have to ask for a change in the IMF’s bylaws to allow her to take over the post as she will be above the age limit by the time the term starts. Some officials have voiced concern that this could raise eyebrows among non-European members of the fund, which would be keen to put forward their own qualified candidates who meet such criteria.
Under a half-century-old agreement, the head of the IMF is a European while the US picks the World Bank chief. That tradition prevailed when David Malpass was selected as the World Bank’s president in April. But Europeans are uncertain whether President Donald Trump’s administration will return the favour — and emerging markets have been arguing for years that the current arrangement doesn’t reflect a world that’s since evolved.
With Joost Akkermans