A supplied image of Aboriginal elder and Goolarabooloo Law Boss Richard Hunter alongside a 1.75m sauropod dinosaur track in the Lower Cretaceous Broome Sandstone, Walmadany area, Dampier Peninsula, in Western Australia. Picture via REUTERS
A supplied image of Aboriginal elder and Goolarabooloo Law Boss Richard Hunter alongside a 1.75m sauropod dinosaur track in the Lower Cretaceous Broome Sandstone, Walmadany area, Dampier Peninsula, in Western Australia. Picture via REUTERS

Melbourne — Australia should set out a new national legal framework to protect Aboriginal cultural heritage, an inquiry into the destruction of ancient rock shelters for an iron ore mine found in its final report on Monday.

The report reads Aboriginal traditional owners should be the top decisionmakers on development applications that could affect their heritage and have the power to withhold consent and to take civil action to enforce proposed new laws.

The recommendations followed a 16-month parliamentary inquiry into how Rio Tinto last year legally destroyed the sites at Juukan Gorge, Western Australia, that showed evidence of human habitation over 46,000 years, from the last Ice Age.

Widespread anger at the destruction of the caves put a focus on industry practices and cost the jobs of Rio’s then-CEO and two other senior leaders and led chairperson Simon Thompson to flag he will step down in 2022.

The committee, which recommended in December that Rio should pay restitution to the traditional owners, on Monday set out recommendations for reform of a patchwork of state and federal laws with differing definitions and processes, all of which it found contained “serious deficiencies”.

“It became apparent to the committee that legislation designed to protect cultural heritage has, in many cases, directly contributed to damage and destruction,” the report reads.

Rio Tinto said in a statement it welcomes the findings.

Reviewed sites

“We are focused on improving our engagement with indigenous peoples and our host communities to better understand their priorities and concerns, minimise our impacts, and responsibly manage indigenous cultural heritage,” the company said.

Rio said it has reviewed more than 2,200 heritage sites within its existing mine plans and has boosted staff overseeing heritage practices by 20% on last year to 300 people.

The committee’s recommendations are likely to sit well with Aboriginal groups which have been calling for more decision-making control about their heritage, as well as for national standards.

The traditional owners of the destroyed caves, the Puutu Kunti Kurrama and Pinikura (PKKP) people, said the sense of sorrow and loss remains.

“The response by Rio Tinto, other mining companies and government decisionmakers to the events at Juukan Gorge will be a test case for First Nations people throughout Australia and internationally,” the PKKP said, adding that they are working with Rio to improve the relationship.

The report recommends the Australian government legislate a new framework for cultural heritage protection at the national level in agreement with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

The new legislation should set out minimum standards for state protections and traditional owners must have primary decision-making power regarding their cultural heritage in development processes.

Damaged standing

The legislation must include adequate compliance and enforcement mechanisms as well as penalties, the report reads.

Industry superannuation fund Hesta said it supports a new legal framework but warned mining companies they should not wait for legislative change to improve practices that have damaged the standing of Australia’s mining industry.

“The gap between our current laws and community expectations creates risk for companies and investors,” it said.

The report comes as Western Australia is set to announce an overhaul of its heritage protection laws that Aboriginal groups have criticised because final development decisions remain with the state government.

Other recommendations included for industry and government to fund Aboriginal development review bodies in return for greater transparency from these groups.

The federal government has six months to table its response to the report.

Reuters

subscribe

Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.