Calls for Australian mining sector overhaul
Industry urged to improve how it obtains consent from Aboriginal groups after Rio Tinto’s destruction of ancient Australian rockshelters
Melbourne — Rio Tinto’s legal destruction of ancient Australian rockshelters showed the mining sector was exposed to material investment risks without more reforms, institutional investors said on Thursday, backing the findings of a review into the incident.
The interim parliamentary review into how global miner Rio legally destroyed the sites at the Juukan Gorge in May recommended it pay restitution to the traditional owners, and that the industry improve how it obtains consent from Aboriginal groups to impact heritage sites on their ancestral lands.
“The report has ... highlighted the material risks for investors,” said Australian Council of Superannuation Investors CEO Louise Davidson.
“Long-term investors support structural and cultural changes to the way companies approach their relationships with First Nations stakeholders,” Davidson said in a statement, supporting legal reform that would ensure consent was gained in line with global standards.
ACSI represents 37 asset owners and institutional investors which collectively own on average 10% of every ASX200 company.
The focus by investors has been on ensuring continuing, free, prior and informed consent which is defined as a human right under UN principles for dealing with First Nations people.
The concept has made uneasy some in the mining industry who see it as potentially undermining certainty for their multiyear, billion dollar investments.
“Action must be undertaken by the Western Australian Government and the mining industry to rebalance the relationship between the mining industry and Traditional Owners,” the report found.
While new legislation in Western Australia is being established, expected some time next year, the mining industry must take extra care to ensure proper consent is obtained, the inquiry said.
“Mining companies failing to negotiate fairly and in good faith with traditional owners represents a clear systemic risk to investors,” said CEO Debby Blakey of HESTA, an investor and health industry superannuation fund. Iron ore miner Fortescue Metals said during the inquiry it had continued with the development of a rail line around “Spear Hill” in 2017 despite opposition by the Wintawari traditional owners because the group had not earlier raised concerns despite a “detailed consultation process.”
The rail line was ultimately rerouted after the Western Australian government intervened.
“Our consultation with Wintawari has been ongoing for 10 years and we have taken their direction on areas of heritage significance when planning our mining operations,” Fortescue said in a statement.
“There is no factual basis to the assertion that Fortescue changed our rail alignment based on pressure from the WA State Government, but rather the changes occurred as the result of effective consultation with Wintawari.”
Representatives for the Wintawari did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Fortescue’s statement.
In a submission to the Juukan Gorge inquiry dated November 5, Wintawari charactecterised Fortescue’s historical approach to development application processes as “bullying, dismissive, disrespectful, and inconsistent with their published values and the expected behaviours of an ASX Top 10 company.”
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.