Brazil still mulling completion of costly nuclear plant

Brasilia — Brazil’s government is divided over whether to complete its third nuclear power plant after 40 years of off-and-on construction, as the country’s economic team has started to push for the project to be abandoned, two sources familiar with the matter said.

The final decision over the plant, called Angra 3, rests with the National Energy Policy Council (CNPE), which postponed a ruling last year and was set to meet on Tuesday to discuss the plant. It is unclear if the issue will be resolved then.

Construction of the plant, located in the coastal town of Angra dos Reis, began in the 1980s but has faced multiple stoppages due to funding shortages and a 2015 corruption probe. A 2022 attempt to revive the project faltered.

The debate comes as President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva aims to position Latin America’s largest economy as a hub for green investment. In recent years, several countries have reconsidered nuclear energy in response to increasing demand for climate-friendly power.

Some argue that supporting nuclear energy undermines Brazil’s natural advantages in renewable sources such as wind, solar and hydropower. But many experts consider nuclear a good alternative to thermal power, which is more expensive and polluting, but often relied upon during droughts. Both have similar costs.

“This is a tough battle,” said one economic team source, speaking on condition of anonymity due to the private nature of the discussions. “The main argument against it is the lack of funding. Who will cut their budget to make room for this?”

Energy minister Alexandre Silveira is a major supporter of the project. “We have to complete it,” he said last November, calling Angra 3 a “mausoleum”.

The finance and planning ministries declined to comment. The mines & energy ministry did not respond to requests for comment.

A study by state development bank BNDES estimated that completing the plant would require 23-billion real ($4bn) on top of the 12-billion real already spent.

Eletronuclear, the state-controlled company overseeing the project, said five more years of construction are needed, plus time for bidding and site mobilisation.

Alternatively, BNDES estimated that scrapping the project would incur 21-billion real of costs, including contract terminations and penalties for cancelling subsidised financing.

But one source said the finance ministry has modelled scenarios where total costs could reach 30-billion real and warned that electricity from the plant could drive up power bills.

Eletronuclear president Raul Lycurgo Leite, an advocate for the plant, said his team plans to raise most of the required funds from the market.

“The worst infrastructure project is one that remains stalled,” he said, noting that maintaining the unfinished Angra 3 site costs more than 1-billion real annually.

Reuters