Federal justice finds request moot after multibillionaire misses court-ordered testimony over SpaceX launch
24 November 2024 - 14:21
byJonathan Stempel
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
New York — A federal judge on Friday rejected the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s request to sanction Elon Musk after he failed to appear for court-ordered testimony for the regulator’s probe into his $44bn takeover of Twitter.
US District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley in San Francisco said sanctions over Musk’s September 10 absence were unnecessary, after the world’s richest person testified on October 3 and agreed to pay the SEC’s $2,923 in travel costs.
“Because the present circumstances forestall any occasion for meaningful relief that the court could grant, the SEC’s request is moot,” Corley wrote.
The SEC had sought a declaration that Musk violated a May 31 court order to provide testimony.
It said having only to repay travel costs would not deter many other people from ignoring court orders, “much less someone of Musk’s extraordinary means.”
Musk said he complied with the order by testifying on October 3. He is worth $321.7bn according to Forbes magazine.
The SEC did not immediately respond to a request for comment after business hours. Lawyers for Musk did not immediately respond to similar requests.
Musk, whose businesses include electric car maker Tesla and rocket company SpaceX, and who is the world’s richest person, went to Florida’s Cape Canaveral on September 10 to oversee the launch of SpaceX’s Polaris Dawn mission.
The SEC is investigating whether Musk violated securities laws in early 2022 by waiting at least 10 days too long to disclose he had begun accumulating Twitter stock.
Critics and some investors have said this let him buy shares cheaply before he eventually disclosed a 9.2% Twitter stake, and shortly thereafter offered to buy the whole company.
In July, Musk said he misunderstood SEC disclosure rules and that “all indications” suggested he made a “mistake.”
The SEC also sued Musk in 2018 over his Twitter posts about taking Tesla private. He settled that lawsuit by paying a $20m fine, agreeing to let Tesla lawyers review some posts in advance and stepping down as Tesla’s chairperson.
The case is SEC v Musk, US District Court, Northern District of California, No 23-mc-80253.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Judge rejects SEC bid to sanction Elon Musk
Federal justice finds request moot after multibillionaire misses court-ordered testimony over SpaceX launch
New York — A federal judge on Friday rejected the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s request to sanction Elon Musk after he failed to appear for court-ordered testimony for the regulator’s probe into his $44bn takeover of Twitter.
US District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley in San Francisco said sanctions over Musk’s September 10 absence were unnecessary, after the world’s richest person testified on October 3 and agreed to pay the SEC’s $2,923 in travel costs.
“Because the present circumstances forestall any occasion for meaningful relief that the court could grant, the SEC’s request is moot,” Corley wrote.
The SEC had sought a declaration that Musk violated a May 31 court order to provide testimony.
It said having only to repay travel costs would not deter many other people from ignoring court orders, “much less someone of Musk’s extraordinary means.”
Musk said he complied with the order by testifying on October 3. He is worth $321.7bn according to Forbes magazine.
The SEC did not immediately respond to a request for comment after business hours. Lawyers for Musk did not immediately respond to similar requests.
Musk, whose businesses include electric car maker Tesla and rocket company SpaceX, and who is the world’s richest person, went to Florida’s Cape Canaveral on September 10 to oversee the launch of SpaceX’s Polaris Dawn mission.
The SEC is investigating whether Musk violated securities laws in early 2022 by waiting at least 10 days too long to disclose he had begun accumulating Twitter stock.
Critics and some investors have said this let him buy shares cheaply before he eventually disclosed a 9.2% Twitter stake, and shortly thereafter offered to buy the whole company.
In July, Musk said he misunderstood SEC disclosure rules and that “all indications” suggested he made a “mistake.”
The SEC also sued Musk in 2018 over his Twitter posts about taking Tesla private. He settled that lawsuit by paying a $20m fine, agreeing to let Tesla lawyers review some posts in advance and stepping down as Tesla’s chairperson.
The case is SEC v Musk, US District Court, Northern District of California, No 23-mc-80253.
Reuters
Guardian quits X, citing ‘racism and conspiracy theories’
SAM MKOKELI: Trumpian anarchy set to be loosed upon the world
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
YACOOB ABBA OMAR: The macro and micro of the Trump triumph
Musk seeks ‘high IQ’ staff for efficiency panel
ANTHONY BUTLER: Let’s send Zuma to join Musk in helping the Trump administration
NEWS ANALYSIS: Trump rewards staunch allies with posts in new administration
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.