Washington says it will only support a resolution that also calls for the immediate release of hostages
20 November 2024 - 20:41
byDavid Brunnstrom and Simon Lewis
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
The UN Security Council in New York, the US, March 25 2024. Picture: REUTERS/Andrew Kelly
New York — The US on Wednesday vetoed a UN Security Council resolution for a ceasefire in Gaza, drawing criticism of the Biden administration for once again blocking international action aimed at halting Israel’s war with Hamas.
The 15-member council voted on a resolution put forward by 10 non-permanent members that called for an “immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire” in the 13-month conflict and separately demanded the release of hostages.
Only the US voted against, using its veto as a permanent council member to block the resolution.
Robert Wood, the deputy US ambassador to the UN, said Washington had made clear it would only support a resolution that explicitly calls for the immediate release of hostages as part of a ceasefire.
“A durable end to the war must come with the release of the hostages. These two urgent goals are inextricably linked. This resolution abandoned that necessity, and for that reason, the US could not support it,” he said.
Wood said the US had sought compromise, but the text of the proposed resolution would have sent a “dangerous message” to Hamas that “there’s no need to come back to the negotiating table”.
Israel’s campaign in Gaza has killed almost 44,000 people and displaced nearly all the enclave’s population at least once. It was launched in response to an attack by Hamas-led fighters who killed 1,200 people and captured more than 250 hostages in Israel on October 7 2023.
Security Council members roundly criticised the US for blocking the resolution put forward by Algeria, Ecuador, Guyana, Japan, Malta, Mozambique, South Korea, Sierra Leone, Slovenia and Switzerland.
“It is deeply regretted that due to the use of the veto this council has once again failed to uphold its responsibility to maintain international peace and security,” Malta’s UN ambassador Vanessa Frazier said after the vote failed, adding that the text of the resolution “was by no means a maximalist one”.
“It represented the bare minimum of what is needed to begin to address the desperate situation on the ground,” she said.
Food security experts have warned that famine is imminent among Gaza’s 2.3-million people. US President Joe Biden, who leaves office on January 20, has offered Israel strong diplomatic backing and continued to provide arms for the war, while trying unsuccessfully to broker a ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas that would see hostages released in exchange for Palestinians held by Israel.
After blocking earlier resolutions on Gaza, Washington in March abstained from a vote that allowed a resolution to pass demanding an immediate ceasefire.
A senior US official, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity before Wednesday’s vote, said the UK had put forward new language that the US would have supported as a compromise, but that was rejected by the elected members.
Some members were more interested in bringing about a US veto than compromising on the resolution, the official said, accusing Russia and China of encouraging those members.
‘Green light’
France’s UN ambassador Nicolas de Riviere said the resolution rejected by the US “very firmly” required the release of hostages.
“France still has two hostages in Gaza, and we deeply regret that the Security Council was not able to formulate this demand,” he said.
China’s UN ambassador Fu Cong said each time the US had exercised its veto to protect Israel, the number of people killed in Gaza had steadily risen.
“How many more people have to die before they wake up from their pretend slumber?” he said. “Insistence on setting a precondition for ceasefire is tantamount to giving the green light to continue the war and condoning the continued killing.”
Israel’s UN ambassador Danny Danon said before the vote that the text was not a resolution for peace but was “a resolution for appeasement” of Hamas.
“History will remember who stood with the hostages and who abandoned them,” Danon said.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
US vetoes UN resolution on Gaza ceasefire
Washington says it will only support a resolution that also calls for the immediate release of hostages
New York — The US on Wednesday vetoed a UN Security Council resolution for a ceasefire in Gaza, drawing criticism of the Biden administration for once again blocking international action aimed at halting Israel’s war with Hamas.
The 15-member council voted on a resolution put forward by 10 non-permanent members that called for an “immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire” in the 13-month conflict and separately demanded the release of hostages.
Only the US voted against, using its veto as a permanent council member to block the resolution.
Robert Wood, the deputy US ambassador to the UN, said Washington had made clear it would only support a resolution that explicitly calls for the immediate release of hostages as part of a ceasefire.
“A durable end to the war must come with the release of the hostages. These two urgent goals are inextricably linked. This resolution abandoned that necessity, and for that reason, the US could not support it,” he said.
Ramaphosa says SA’s G20 presidency a chance to reform global governance
Wood said the US had sought compromise, but the text of the proposed resolution would have sent a “dangerous message” to Hamas that “there’s no need to come back to the negotiating table”.
Israel’s campaign in Gaza has killed almost 44,000 people and displaced nearly all the enclave’s population at least once. It was launched in response to an attack by Hamas-led fighters who killed 1,200 people and captured more than 250 hostages in Israel on October 7 2023.
Security Council members roundly criticised the US for blocking the resolution put forward by Algeria, Ecuador, Guyana, Japan, Malta, Mozambique, South Korea, Sierra Leone, Slovenia and Switzerland.
“It is deeply regretted that due to the use of the veto this council has once again failed to uphold its responsibility to maintain international peace and security,” Malta’s UN ambassador Vanessa Frazier said after the vote failed, adding that the text of the resolution “was by no means a maximalist one”.
“It represented the bare minimum of what is needed to begin to address the desperate situation on the ground,” she said.
Food security experts have warned that famine is imminent among Gaza’s 2.3-million people. US President Joe Biden, who leaves office on January 20, has offered Israel strong diplomatic backing and continued to provide arms for the war, while trying unsuccessfully to broker a ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas that would see hostages released in exchange for Palestinians held by Israel.
After blocking earlier resolutions on Gaza, Washington in March abstained from a vote that allowed a resolution to pass demanding an immediate ceasefire.
A senior US official, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity before Wednesday’s vote, said the UK had put forward new language that the US would have supported as a compromise, but that was rejected by the elected members.
Some members were more interested in bringing about a US veto than compromising on the resolution, the official said, accusing Russia and China of encouraging those members.
‘Green light’
France’s UN ambassador Nicolas de Riviere said the resolution rejected by the US “very firmly” required the release of hostages.
“France still has two hostages in Gaza, and we deeply regret that the Security Council was not able to formulate this demand,” he said.
China’s UN ambassador Fu Cong said each time the US had exercised its veto to protect Israel, the number of people killed in Gaza had steadily risen.
“How many more people have to die before they wake up from their pretend slumber?” he said. “Insistence on setting a precondition for ceasefire is tantamount to giving the green light to continue the war and condoning the continued killing.”
Israel’s UN ambassador Danny Danon said before the vote that the text was not a resolution for peace but was “a resolution for appeasement” of Hamas.
“History will remember who stood with the hostages and who abandoned them,” Danon said.
Reuters
EDITORIAL: G20 hands SA a huge challenge and opportunity
Palestinians say north Gaza destruction is widespread as rights group warns some may never return
RONAK GOPALDAS: Historical alliances will not soften US’s approach to SA
Qatar stalls its Gaza ceasefire mediation
Dutch police detain 50 pro-Palestinian protesters after anti-Israeli violence
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Hamas attack on Israel stirs controversy among Gaza clerics
Israeli strikes kill 18 in Gaza, say medics
Pope urges investigation into Gaza genocide allegations
Dozens claimed killed and wounded in Israeli strike on building
RONAK GOPALDAS: Historical alliances will not soften US’s approach to SA
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.