We've got news for you.

Register on BusinessLIVE at no cost to receive newsletters, read exclusive articles & more.
Register now

Washington — Eighteen Democratic legislators are urging US treasury secretary Janet Yellen to endorse a review aimed at ending the IMF’s policy of charging countries significant surcharges on larger loans that are not repaid quickly.

In a January 10 letter to Yellen led by representatives Jesus Garcia, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Pramila Jayapal, the legislators called the policy “unfair and counterproductive”, and said it robbed countries of resources needed to combat the Covid-19 pandemic.

“At a time when countries around the world should be focused on this public health crisis, these surcharges divert billions of dollars into the IMF’s pockets here in Washington and prevent an equitable recovery,” Garcia said in a statement to Reuters.

The letter, a copy of which was viewed by Reuters, said the policy could also increase the risk of sovereign defaults.

Argentina, which is expected to spend about $3.3bn on surcharges from 2018 to 2023, has repeatedly asked for temporary relief from the surcharges given the Covid-19 crisis, but IMF executive board members remain divided over the broader issue.

The Argentinian government is also negotiating with the IMF to roll over about $45bn it owes the global lender from a $57bn standby loan signed by the previous government in 2018.

Nobel prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, a professor at Columbia University, and Kevin Gallagher, who heads the Global Development Policy Center at Boston University, backed the call for reform in a paper published in October, arguing that surcharges hit countries when they could least afford them.

They said the IMF estimated that borrowing countries would pay more than $4bn in surcharges on top of interest payments and fees from the start of the pandemic to the end of 2022.

IMF executive board members in December discussed the role of surcharges, now the fund’s largest source of revenue, with some open to temporary relief, while others saw no need to review the policies on surcharges. Those opposed cited the overall low total cost of borrowing from the fund and the role surcharge income plays in ensuring an adequate build-up of risk buffers for the global lender, the IMF said at the time.

Germany, France and Britain are open to reviewing the IMF’s surcharge policy, but the US, the fund’s largest shareholder, has argued against such a move.

Surcharges do not apply to the poorest borrowers, and help build precautionary balances to protect the IMF’s shareholders against potential losses from these higher-risk programmes, a source familiar with the treasury’s position said.



Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

Commenting is subject to our house rules.