Here are the two ways Donald Trump could be removed before January 20
Impeachment or the 25th amendment? Either one is feasible with one professor saying Trump ‘arguably fomented sedition’
Washington — The storming of the US Capitol by supporters of President Donald Trump on Wednesday has prompted calls by some lawmakers to remove him from office before president-elect Joe Biden is sworn in on January 20.
The chaotic scenes unfolded after Republican Trump, who had refused to commit to a peaceful transfer of power, addressed thousands of protesters and repeated unfounded claims that the election was stolen from him.
There are two ways to remove a president from office: the 25th Amendment of the US constitution and impeachment followed by a Senate conviction. In either scenario, vice-president Mike Pence would take over until Biden’s inauguration.
A source familiar with the effort said there have been some preliminary discussions among some cabinet members and Trump allies about invoking the 25th Amendment.
What’s the purpose of the 25th amendment?
The 25th amendment, ratified in 1967 and adopted in the wake of president John F Kennedy’s assassination in 1963, deals with presidential succession and disability.
Section 4 addresses situations in which a president is unable to do the job but does not step down voluntarily.
The drafters of the 25th amendment clearly intended for it to apply when a president is incapacitated by a physical or mental illness, experts say. Some scholars have also argued it could also apply more broadly to a president who is dangerously unfit for office.
For the 25th amendment to be invoked, Pence and the majority of Trump’s cabinet would need to declare that Trump is unable to perform the duties of the presidency and remove him. Pence would take over, in that scenario.
Trump could subsequently declare that he is capable of resuming the job. If Pence and the majority of the cabinet do not contest Trump’s determination, Trump regains power. If they dispute Trump’s declaration, the issue would then be decided by Congress, but Pence would continue to act as president until then.
A two-thirds majority of both chambers would be needed to keep Trump sidelined. But the Democrat-controlled House could simply delay voting on the substantive dispute until Trump's term ends, said Paul Campos, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Colorado.
Campos said the 25th amendment would be an appropriate way to remove Trump from office and has the benefit of being quicker than impeachment.
“Pence could instantly become president, whereas impeachment and conviction could take at least a few days,” Campos said.
Can Trump be impeached and removed?
A misconception about “impeachment” is that it refers to the removal of a president from office. In fact, impeachment refers only to the House of Representatives, the lower chamber of Congress, bringing charges that a president engaged in a “high crime or misdemeanour” — similar to an indictment in a criminal case.
If a simple majority of the House’s 435 members approves bringing charges, known as “articles of impeachment”, the process moves to the Senate, the upper chamber, which holds a trial to determine the president’s guilt. The constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict and remove a president.
Trump was impeached by the Democrat-led US House in December 2019 on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress stemming from his efforts to pressure Ukraine to investigate Biden and his son. Trump was acquitted by the Republican-led Senate in February 2020.
What ‘high crime and misdemeanour’ could Trump be accused of?
Frank Bowman, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Missouri, said Trump “arguably fomented sedition”, or an attempted overthrowing of the US government.
But Bowman said Trump could also be impeached for a more general offence: disloyalty to the US constitution and failing to uphold his oath of office. Congress has discretion in defining a high crime and misdemeanour and is not limited to actual criminal offences.
Said Bowman: “The essential offence would be one against the constitution — one of essentially trying to undermine the lawful results of a lawfully conducted election.”
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.