Stanford and Yale join court challenge over Trump’s foreign student visa rule
Ivy League schools argue the new rule is causing ‘harm and turmoil’ to international students as more universities go online amid Covid-19
Washington — Almost 60 US universities filed a court brief in support of Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in a case the schools brought to stop new visa rules that could bar many international students.
Stanford University and Ivy League schools including Yale and Princeton were among those that filed a so-called amicus brief on Sunday. They argued that the new rules, which require in-person teaching for a student visa, are “causing significant harm and turmoil”. Students now on visas can have remote teaching for the duration of the Covid-19 pandemic, they said.
US higher education, already facing long-term challenges because of changing demographics, has been severely hit by the crisis, closing campuses and giving refunds earlier in 2020. As schools try to prepare for coming classes, more are saying they will be fully online for the foreseeable future — a plan that now could jeopardise many of the 213,000 international students that enrol every year via the visa programme.
“This new directive forces international students to choose between pursuing their academic dreams or risking deportation, all the while throwing months of careful planning by colleges and universities into disarray,” Ishan Bhabha, a partner at law firm Jenner & Block, which is representing the colleges, said in a statement.
The brief cites students affected by the guidance. They include a Rice University student working on Covid-19 research and developing low-cost ventilators who would be forced out of the country.
Harvard and MIT sued US immigration and customs enforcement (ICE) last week after the agency issued the rules, which would block visas for applicants studying at colleges that only offer virtual instruction. Students on existing visas who want to remain in the US must transfer to a school with in-person instruction or attend one that offers both remote and on-campus learning.
The Trump administration’s decision to rescind a coronavirus exemption to ICE’s in-person class requirements was “arbitrary and capricious”, Harvard and MIT said. It also violates the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to allow public comment and consider harm to students, they said.
Jenner & Block was among several law firms that persuaded the supreme court to protect young undocumented immigrants, known as Dreamers, from deportation.
On Friday, the schools filed a request for a preliminary injunction. A hearing is scheduled for July 15.
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.