New York/Singapore — Negative interest rates in the US were once unimaginable. The coronavirus has changed that.
While the Federal Reserve has all but ruled it out, the sweeping impact of the pandemic on economic and financial markets has forced investors to give serious thought to the implications of such a drastic policy shift.
Rate options, which gauge monetary policy expectations, on Monday implied a 23% probability that the federal funds rate will go below zero by the end of December, according to BofA Securities data, which cited short expiry options on one-year US swap rates. That compares with a 9%-10% probability last week.
Fed funds futures are pricing in rates of about one basis point below zero by June 2021 as the pandemic hammers the US economy towards its steepest downturn since the Great Depression.
“It has gone from theoretical to distinctly possible,” said Michael Purves, CEO of Tallbacken Capital advisers.
Purves still thinks the Federal Reserve is “far away” from actually going negative. Yet the unprecedented price moves show a market bracing for the unthinkable, and investors preparing for consequences ranging from a bank profit squeeze to sub-zero bond yields, money market turmoil and capital outflows.
Scott Minerd, global CIO at Guggenheim Partners, sees a chance that bond buying from the Fed pushes benchmark US yields to uncharted negative territory.
A projection on Guggenheim Partners’ website shows benchmark 10-year yields hitting -0.5% at the end of 2021.
Investors worry that the US crossing the zero mark may have bigger disruptive side effects in money markets than the years of negative rates in Europe and Japan.
“The adoption of negative rates in the US would cause more disruptions than in Japan or Europe,” said Ayako Sera, market strategist at Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank in Tokyo.
“In the US, companies rely on credit markets for their financing. Adopting negative rates in the US would disrupt the pricing of so many securities.”
The lower bound of the Fed’s benchmark rate is already zero. Negative rates are generally viewed as an emergency measure for spurring growth even more.
Yet because years of such policies in Europe and Japan have failed to provide a panacea, there is plenty of scepticism that the US will follow suit.
Fed chair Jerome Powell said in March that negative rates would be unlikely to help the economy. Investors expect him to reinforce that message during webcast comments scheduled for Wednesday.
Political blowback from a move that would hurt savers, in a country where saving is part of the national psyche, would also be difficult to navigate, as would harm to the financial sector which depends on interest rate margins for income from loans.
Still, the economic damage caused by the coronavirus pandemic has already forced the Fed to roll out an unprecedented range of programs, including expanding its corporate bond-buying to include some speculative-grade debt.
“Negative rates are possible,” said Akira Takei, fund manager at Asset Management One, who is bullish longer term US Treasuries and betting benchmark US 10-year yields could drop to zero.
The policy effectively redistributes income from those who have benefited from many years of lending to those who need to borrow, he said. “In that sense, they are similar to various income and rent support programs for those who have been hit by the lockdowns.”
Hot bonds, maybe not stocks
Ultra-low rates drive demand for bonds, since their higher coupon becomes more attractive.
That in turn compresses yields, a factor that has already pushed up gold prices, since the metal becomes more attractive relative to bonds. Gold is up about 12% this year.
Beyond that, negative rates could drive money out of the US as investors seek higher yields abroad, said Cecilia Chan, Asia-Pacific CIO for fixed income at HSBC Global Asset Management in Hong Kong.
“I don’t expect that negative rates would be sustained in the US,” she said. “But I think the impact on Asian credit would probably be positive. Asian bonds offer some decent yield pickup against deposit rates.”
In equities, the consequences are less clear because of the extreme level of uncertainty about current and future company earnings.
Negative rates could accelerate a rotation away from under-pressure financials into pharmaceuticals, utilities and telecoms, where dividends tend to be higher, said John Praveen, portfolio manager for QMA, the quantitative equity and global multi-asset solutions business of PGIM.
He believes, however, that rates are unlikely to fall below zero any time soon and, if they did, it would be a bad signal.
“If the Fed actually decides to go negative it is a sign that they have run out of ammunition. Clearly that is not the case.”