Los Angeles — where stars are born and oil is drilled in suburbs
Los Angeles — For most outsiders, Los Angeles is all about Hollywood, palm trees and sunny skies.
But the huge metropolis that is home to nearly 4-million people is also the largest urban oilfield in the country.
Hundreds of active oil wells sit in densely populated and mostly low-income neighbourhoods of the county, butting up against schools, homes, parks, shopping malls or cemeteries.
Though the drill sites have been part of the landscape for decades and are an integral part of the city’s history, they have increasingly become unwelcome neighbours for residents and environmental activists who say they pose a public health risk and should be phased out in urban areas.
“We don’t need to be doing this any more,” said Martha Dina Arguello, director of the Los Angeles chapter of the non-profit Physicians for Social Responsibility and co-chair of STAND-LA (Stand Together Against Neighbourhood Drilling), a coalition of community-based groups working to stamp out urban oil drilling.
Arguello spoke to AFP as she stood in front of a drilling site in a residential neighbourhood northwest of downtown Los Angeles and adjacent to three schools and a park.
“How much profit is it worth to expose all of the people here to the risk of a catastrophic accident?” said Arguello, pointing to 10 pumpjacks hidden behind a fence and bobbing up and down like prehistoric birds as they sucked up oil.
“These oil sites shouldn’t be in our communities,” she added. “They are a source of air pollution … and they’re part of the climate crisis.”
The pushback against urban oil has prompted several local legislators and environmental advocates to call for a ban on new permits for oil drilling in the state and for a 760m buffer around all neighbourhood oil drilling sites.
A meeting on the subject held at Los Angeles City Hall in October drew a standing-room crowd of concerned citizens but also dozens of industry workers worried about losing their livelihood.
The issue has even been championed by Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg, who joined fellow teenagers in Los Angeles earlier in November to protest oil drilling in the state.
Amalia Sanchez, one of the people who spoke at the City Hall meeting, said residents in her working-class neighbourhood of Wilmington, south of downtown Los Angeles, often complain of asthma and headaches as well as a nauseating smell from nearby oilfields.
“People question why I still live here but where else can I go? I don’t have money to pay more rent,” said the 62-year-old who has asthma and was recently diagnosed with a lung tumour. “Nobody cares about us because we are poor.”
Further north, in a neighbourhood close to the University of Southern California (USC), Anna Parks worries about the three oil-drilling sites near her home and the effect on her children’s health.
“One of the sites has been in the news a lot for children having nosebleeds, breathing problems and headaches related to the fumes coming from the operation,” Parks, a student adviser at USC and part of a community group that has sought to raise awareness on the issue, said on a recent tour of her neighbourhood.
She said while she realises community groups are no match for the powerful oil lobby, there was no reason residents of poorer neighbourhoods of LA should not be given protections long afforded to wealthier communities in the county.
“I thought Los Angeles was a movie town, but it’s really an oil town,” said Parks, who grew up in Seattle, Washington, and moved to California about 20 years ago. “My (three) kids’ favourite park when they were little was located 350 yards from a drill site … and they have been breathing toxins related to oil drilling their entire lives.”
Nowhere is LA’s legacy of oil production more apparent than in Signal Hill, about 35km south of downtown Los Angeles and once referred to as “Porcupine Hill” because of the number of oil derricks in the area.
Today, dozens of pumpjacks — also known as nodding donkeys — still operate in the tiny enclave, many of them sitting among homes and apartment complexes.
But while several residents interviewed said the machines should be removed, especially given the Golden State’s commitment to a low-carbon future, many others took issue with the effect such a move would have on the local economy and the thousands employed by the oil industry.
They also point out that oil production across the state has steadily dropped since the 1980s, with LA county producing about 12-million barrels of oil in 2018 as opposed to nearly 26-million in 2008.
“If we shut down all these facilities, where will all the workers go?” said an oilfield worker sitting at Curley’s Cafe, which has a pumpjack operating in the parking lot. “We need to keep people employed and keep the tax revenues.”
Scepticism also runs deep among those in the industry when it comes to warnings by environmentalists about the health hazards posed by urban oil drilling and the setback buffer proposed.
“There’s no scientific evidence that an arbitrary setback would significantly improve the toughest-on-the-planet regulations Los Angeles producers already follow,” said Rock Zierman, CEO of the California Independent Petroleum Association. “An arbitrary setback amounts to a de facto production ban in Los Angeles.
“This would mean thousands of workers would lose good-paying careers, the city would lose tax revenues to solve priorities like homelessness, and it would mean more imported oil from countries who do not honour environmental protections or human rights.”
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.