What makes Sondland the key witness in the impeachment hearings
Washington — The US ambassador to the EU, Gordon Sondland, will on Wednesday become the first witness with a direct line of communication to President Donald Trump to testify in public to the Democratic-led impeachment inquiry.
Sondland spoke to Trump half a dozen times from mid-July to mid-September, according to the testimony of other witnesses, and could shed light on whether Trump abused his power by making US security aid to Ukraine contingent on Kiev’s agreement to investigate Burisma, an energy company on which Hunter Biden, the son of former vice-president and political rival Joe Biden, had served as a board member.
He is likely to face tough questioning from Democratic and Republican legislators at the US House of Representatives intelligence committee hearing after his revision of previous closed-door testimony to say there was a link between $391m in aid that was withheld and the investigations Trump wanted. Initially, he testified that he knew of no preconditions to the assistance.
Here are some questions about Sondland and his importance to the impeachment inquiry:
What role has Sondland played in US relations with Ukraine?
Sondland was one of three officials who largely took over US-Ukraine policy in May. Career US diplomats have portrayed him in their testimony as a central figure in what became a shadow Ukraine policy operation, undercutting official channels and pressing Kiev to investigate the Bidens.
Ukraine is not part of the EU but aspires to membership, making its issues part of Sondland’s official remit. But his involvement was viewed as a problem by some White House National Security Council officials.
Trump named Sondland to the post after the hotel entrepreneur donated $1m to Trump’s inaugural committee.
What might Sondland be asked to tell the inquiry about Trump and Ukraine?
Democrats have heard testimony that Sondland has had frequent contact with Trump and can provide a first-hand account of Trump’s interest in pressing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to announce an investigation into the Bidens. He will also face questions about the role of the president’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, in that effort.
Lawmakers are likely to delve into one phone conversation between Sondland and Trump on July 26 in which a witness says Sondland reassured Trump the Ukrainians would agree to investigate the Bidens. The call took place the day after Trump’s phone conversation with Zelensky that is at the heart of the inquiry.
David Holmes, a US embassy staffer, testified that Sondland told him after the July 26 call that Trump only cared about “big stuff” in Ukraine, like “the Biden investigation”.
He may also be asked about a July 10 White House meeting where, according to the testimony of one National Security Council official, Sondland made clear that the Ukrainians would have to agree to investigate the Bidens, as well as Burisma, for Zelensky to get an Oval Office meeting with Trump.
How has Sondland’s story changed?
Sondland told lawmakers during closed-door testimony in October that he did not know about any preconditions on US security aid to the Ukraine government, which was approved by Congress to help it fight Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine.
But on November 4, he sent the congressional committees an addendum, saying statements from other witnesses had refreshed his recollection about certain conversations from early September.
In his addendum, he said he remembered that he had told an aide to the Ukrainian president in early September that the US “likely” would not send the aid until Ukraine provided an anticorruption statement they had been discussing.
Sondland referred to prepared testimony by William Taylor, the top diplomat in Ukraine, about a conversation he had with Tim Morrison, a former National Security Council official. In that conversation, according to Taylor, Sondland told an aide to the Ukrainian president that the security money would not come until Ukraine agreed to investigate Burisma.
Sondland also did not recall his July 26 phone conversation with Trump in his original testimony. A person familiar with the matter said he intends to address the issue on Wednesday