Roger Stone, former adviser to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. Picture: BLOOMBERG/AL DRAGO
Roger Stone, former adviser to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. Picture: BLOOMBERG/AL DRAGO

Washington — The federal jury in the criminal trial of US President Donald Trump’s adviser Roger Stone began deliberations on Thursday into whether he lied to Congress about his efforts to learn more about when WikiLeaks would publish damaging e-mails about 2016 Democratic presidential candidate and Trump rival Hillary Clinton.

The 12-member jury, consisting of nine women and three men, represents a diverse cross-section of people, including an Internal Revenue Service civil tax attorney, an employee with AARP (formerly the American Association of Retired Persons), and a former congressional candidate.

Stone has pleaded not guilty to seven counts of obstruction, witness tampering and making false statements in testimony during the House of Representatives intelligence committee’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US elections.

Witness tampering carries a maximum sentence of 20 years. The other counts carry a maximum sentence of five years each. If Stone is convicted, under US sentencing guidelines he would likely face much less jail time as a first-time, non-violent offender.

Prosecutors accused Stone of telling lawmakers five different lies related to the WikiLeaks website and its founder Julian Assange. WikiLeaks released a series of damaging e-mails about Clinton that US intelligence officials and specialcounsel Robert Mueller later concluded had been stolen by Russian hackers.

Some of those lies relate to the existence of certain texts or e-mails, while others pertain to Stone’s conversations with Trump campaign officials and a supposed “intermediary” with WikiLeaks in early August 2016 whom Stone identified to lawmakers as being comedian Randy Credico.

The government and Stone’s attorneys offered closing arguments on Wednesday, with the government telling the jury that Stone lied to Congress to protect Trump’s image.

Stone’s lawyers counter that such a motive makes no sense, because by the time Stone testified to the House intelligence committee in September 2017, Trump was already president.


Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.