US pulls out of missile treaty with Russia, which it says violated its terms
But Russia accuses the US of violating the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, as Nato says it’s ready, but doesn’t want another Cold War
Washington/Moscow — The US formally withdrew from a landmark nuclear missile pact with Russia on Friday after determining that Moscow was in violation of the treaty, something the Kremlin has repeatedly denied.
Washington signaled it would pull out of the arms control treaty six months ago unless Moscow stuck to the accord. Russia called the move a ploy to exit a pact the US wanted to leave anyway in order to develop new missiles.
The 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) was negotiated by then-US president Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. It banned both sides from stationing land-based missiles in Europe with a range of between 500km-5,500km, reducing their ability to launch a nuclear strike at short notice.
“The US will not remain party to a treaty that is deliberately violated by Russia,” US secretary of state Mike Pompeo said in a statement about the US withdrawal. “Russia’s non-compliance under the treaty jeopardises US supreme interests as Russia’s development and fielding of a treaty-violating missile system represents a direct threat to the US and our allies and partners.”
On Feb 2nd, 2019 the U.S. gave Russia six months to return to compliance with the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. Russia refused, so the treaty ends today. The U.S. will not remain party to a treaty when others violate it. Russia bears sole responsibility.— Secretary Pompeo (@SecPompeo) August 2, 2019
Senior administration officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Russia had deployed “multiple battalions” of a cruise missile throughout Russia in violation of the pact, including in western Russia, “with the ability to strike critical European targets”.
Russia denies the allegation, saying the missile’s range puts it outside the treaty. It has rejected a US demand to destroy the new missile, the Novator 9M729, known as the SSC-8 by the Nato Western military alliance.
Moscow has also told Washington its decision to quit the pact undermines global security and removes a key pillar of international arms control.
On Friday Russia said it had asked the US for a moratorium on the deployment of short- and intermediate-range nuclear missiles in Europe.
“We have proposed to the US and other Nato countries that they weigh the possibility of declaring the same kind of moratorium on the deployment of short and intermediate range missiles as ours,” Russian deputy foreign minister Sergei Ryabkov was quoted as saying by the TASS news agency.
President Vladimir Putin says Russia does not want an arms race and has promised he will not deploy Russian missiles unless the US does so first. However, should Washington take such a step, he says he would be forced to deploy Russian hypersonic nuclear missiles on ships or submarines near US territorial waters.
Nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg dismissed Russia’s moratorium request on Friday, saying it was “not a credible offer” since he said Moscow had already deployed illegal missiles. “There are no new US missiles, no new Nato missiles in Europe, but there are more and more new Russian missiles.”
The dispute is aggravating the worst US-Russia friction since the Cold War ended in 1991. Some experts believe the treaty’s collapse could undermine other arms control agreements and speed an erosion of the global system designed to block the spread of nuclear arms.
‘We don’t want a new arms race’
Nato said it had agreed a defensive package of measures to deter Russia. That response would be measured and only involve conventional weapons. Nato’s Stoltenberg said there would be “no rash moves” by the alliance, which he said “would not mirror what Russia does”.
“We don’t want a new arms race,” he said.
Nato members Britain and Poland blamed Moscow for the INF treaty’s demise. “Their contempt for the rules-based international system threatens European security,” British foreign secretary Dominic Raab said on Twitter.
European officials have voiced concern that if the treaty collapses, Europe could again become an arena for a nuclear-armed, intermediate-range missile build-up by the US and Russia.
The US officials said the US is months away from the first flight tests of an American intermediate-range missile that would serve as a counter to the Russians; any deployment would be years away, they said.
“We are just at the stage of looking at how we might further the development of conventional options,” one official said.
Trump has said he would like to see a “next-generation” arms-control deal with Russia and China to cover all types of nuclear weapons, something Beijing has so far rejected.