New York — The legal fallout from Bernard Madoff’s fraud includes an ironic twist: a road map for investors wanting to hold on to profits that seem too good to be true. In the eight years since Madoff’s arrest, court decisions have favoured investors who profited from the scam, damping the hopes of trustee Irving Picard to return more to Madoff’s victims, who had lost $17.5bn in principal, legal experts say. At the core of the disputes is how far Picard can go to make the scheme’s investors whole. "The rulings all lower the risk associated with investing in something that might be a Ponzi scheme," said Anthony Casey, a University of Chicago law school professor. "Some of these were inevitable conclusions of law. The courts weren’t necessarily being lenient to the big institutions. It just happens to help the wealthier investors." Picard and his team of lawyers have recovered about 65 cents on the dollar — more than expected after the collapse of the biggest Ponzi scheme in US histor...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.