Mokgweetsi Masisi (left) addresses supporters during an election campaign rally in Moshupa. Botswana, October 22 2019. Picture: AFP/MONIRUL BHUIYAN
Mokgweetsi Masisi (left) addresses supporters during an election campaign rally in Moshupa. Botswana, October 22 2019. Picture: AFP/MONIRUL BHUIYAN

Gaborone — On Wednesday, Botswana’s court of appeal ruled in favour of hearing an opposition bid to throw out general election results after a lower court rejected the petition for lack of evidence.

The ruling Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) won a sweeping majority in the October 23 polls, securing 38 out of 57 seats in parliament.

The runner-up, the Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC), which won 15 seats, had filed suit to the high court in November, citing “irregularities in some of the constituencies”. But the high court dismissed the petition the following month, saying it lacked supporting affidavits and failed to comply with rules.

But court of appeal judge Singh Walia overturned that ruling. “I am satisfied ... that the applicants have reasonable arguable cases on appeal,” said Walia, delivering his verdict in the capital Gaborone.

The appeal is scheduled to be heard on January 29.

UDC vice-president Dumelang Saleshando welcomed the ruling.

“People who are aggrieved must be given a hearing,” he said, adding that “such a government” should not “be in office for a long period”.

President Mokgweetsi Masisi has previously dismissed the UDC claims of voting irregularities.

Botswana, famed for its diamonds and wildlife, is seen by many in Africa as a beacon of democracy. The BDP has ruled the country since independence from Britain in 1966.

However, the party suffered a jolt in May when former president Ian Khama renounced his hand-picked successor Masisi and backed a new party. The October polls had been predicted to offset the divided BDP’s hold on power and reduce its majority in parliament.

“We know that people voted to be ruled by the BDP for the next five years,” said spokesperson Banks Kentse after the verdict. “The longer it takes for the petitions to be resolved, the more it brings a shadow of uncertainty.”

AFP