G20 regulators omit risks of nature loss, watchdog says
Some are yet to assess the potential fallout for banks and other institutions, the Financial Stability Board warns
18 July 2024 - 17:24
byVirginia Furness
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
London — Financial regulators and supervisors in some G20 countries are overlooking the risks posed by biodiversity loss and deforestation due to insufficient data, focusing instead on climate risks, a report by the G20’s financial watchdog shows.
Regulators who have assessed nature-related risks found that biodiversity and nature loss could cause credit losses, defaults and abrupt price corrections that pose financial risks to banks and other institutions, reads the report released on Thursday by the Financial Stability Board (FSB).
But some are yet to even assess these risks, it said.
Financial institutions face exposure to physical risk through their investments and financing activities in sectors related to nature such as food production. The FSB said more work was needed before they can translate estimates of financial exposures into measures of risk.
Physical risks can arise from the degradation of nature such as a decline in pollinating insects essential for food production or the degradation of agricultural land. That differs from transition risks, which arise from actions and polices aimed at protecting, or reducing negative effects, on nature.
The World Bank has estimated that a partial collapse of the ecosystem could cost 2.3% of global GDP in 2030, with some of the poorest countries worst hit.
Brazil, which holds the current G20 presidency, tasked the FSB — a grouping of central banks, treasury officials and regulators from G20 countries — to carry out the first stocktake of global regulatory and supervisory efforts to identify and assess nature-related financial risks.
The FSB found financial authorities including central banks and finance ministries are at varying stages of evaluating the relevance of biodiversity loss and other nature-related risks as a financial risk. Some were already introducing policies and guidance while others lacked the required data and sufficient capacity to examine such risks.
The study comes before the UN’s COP16 biodiversity conference in Colombia in October where world leaders are under growing pressure to prevent further destruction of key ecosystems.
“This report contributes to international discussions on whether, and if so how, nature degradation, such as biodiversity loss, is a relevant financial risk,” said FSB chair Klaas Knot.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
G20 regulators omit risks of nature loss, watchdog says
Some are yet to assess the potential fallout for banks and other institutions, the Financial Stability Board warns
London — Financial regulators and supervisors in some G20 countries are overlooking the risks posed by biodiversity loss and deforestation due to insufficient data, focusing instead on climate risks, a report by the G20’s financial watchdog shows.
Regulators who have assessed nature-related risks found that biodiversity and nature loss could cause credit losses, defaults and abrupt price corrections that pose financial risks to banks and other institutions, reads the report released on Thursday by the Financial Stability Board (FSB).
But some are yet to even assess these risks, it said.
Financial institutions face exposure to physical risk through their investments and financing activities in sectors related to nature such as food production. The FSB said more work was needed before they can translate estimates of financial exposures into measures of risk.
Physical risks can arise from the degradation of nature such as a decline in pollinating insects essential for food production or the degradation of agricultural land. That differs from transition risks, which arise from actions and polices aimed at protecting, or reducing negative effects, on nature.
The World Bank has estimated that a partial collapse of the ecosystem could cost 2.3% of global GDP in 2030, with some of the poorest countries worst hit.
Brazil, which holds the current G20 presidency, tasked the FSB — a grouping of central banks, treasury officials and regulators from G20 countries — to carry out the first stocktake of global regulatory and supervisory efforts to identify and assess nature-related financial risks.
The FSB found financial authorities including central banks and finance ministries are at varying stages of evaluating the relevance of biodiversity loss and other nature-related risks as a financial risk. Some were already introducing policies and guidance while others lacked the required data and sufficient capacity to examine such risks.
The study comes before the UN’s COP16 biodiversity conference in Colombia in October where world leaders are under growing pressure to prevent further destruction of key ecosystems.
“This report contributes to international discussions on whether, and if so how, nature degradation, such as biodiversity loss, is a relevant financial risk,” said FSB chair Klaas Knot.
Reuters
UN climate chief warns global plans are losing urgency
Renewable energy growth soars but fails to meet climate targets
World Bank to source $100bn for energy alleviation in Africa
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
SA must be sensible about climate change, says new environment minister Dion ...
ROSS HARVEY: The myth of ‘too many elephants’
Chile scientists warn of Humboldt penguin extinction risk
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.