Players shrug off risks in crypto earning games

London — Jarindr Thitadilaka says he made as much as $2,000 (R29,500) a month last year from his collection of digital pets, which he would breed and send into battle to win cryptocurrencies.

The 28-year-old from Bangkok was playing Axie Infinity, one of a new breed of blockchain-based online games, dubbed “play-to-earn”, which blend entertainment with financial speculation.

These games can make for lucrative businesses amid the hype around NFTs and virtual worlds, attracting millions of players plus billions of dollars from investors who see the games as a way to introduce more people to cryptocurrency.

In Axie Infinity, users buy virtual blob-like creatures with varying attributes as NFTs, or non-fungible tokens — digital assets whose owner is recorded on the blockchain — for anything from tens of dollars to hundreds of thousands.

Players can then use the pets to earn money by winning battles, as well as creating new pets, whose value depends on their rarity. The assets can be traded with other players on the platform, which says it has about 1.5-million daily users.

“It’s not just a game any more. It’s more like an ecosystem,” said Thitadilaka. “You can even call it a country, right?”

The dangers of this speculative ecosystem, and the largely unregulated crypto gaming industry, were brought into sudden focus last week when Axie Infinity was hit by a $615m heist. Hackers targeted a part of the system used to transfer cryptocurrency in and out of the game.

Axie Infinity’s Vietnam-based owner, Sky Mavis, said it would reimburse the lost money through a combination of its own balance sheet funds and $150m raised by investors including cryptocurrency exchange Binance and venture capital firm a16z.

Sky Mavis co-founder Aleksander Larsen told Reuters that if he could do things differently, he would have focused more on security when growing the game, which was launched in 2018.

“We were running 100 miles per hour, basically, to even get to this point,” he said. “The trade-offs we made maybe weren’t the ideal ones.”

The hack, one of the biggest crypto heists ever, shone a light on play-to-earn games — a young world largely unknown outside crypto and gaming circles — that’s becoming big business.

Players spent $4.9bn on NFTs in games last year, according to market tracker DappRadar, representing about 3% of the global gaming industry. Though demand has cooled since a peak last November, gaming NFTs have still racked up $484m in sales so far in 2022.

Investor interest in NFT-based games has also ballooned, with projects attracting $4bn of venture capital funding last year, up from $80,000 in 2020, DappRadar said.

“There’s so many users who want to interact with the tech,” said Larsen, adding that Axie Infinity’s revenues exceeded $1.3bn last year. “It’s like you found a new continent ... like finding America all over again.”

Haves and have nots 

Adding layers of complexity, unofficial financial networks have also emerged around these games, as some players leverage their coveted in-game possessions for further gain.

Thitadilaka in Thailand decided last July that he wanted to make more money than he could by simply playing on his own, so he and his friends decided to form what’s known in gaming lingo as a “guild”. They allowed their NFTs to be used by people who wanted to play Axie Infinity for free, without investing in an asset, and took a cut of any winnings in return.

This model is commonplace across play-to-earn games. Thitadilaka said his guild, GuildFi, grew into a network with 3,000 Axie Infinity players who split their earnings with the asset-owners 50:50. Thitadilaka now runs GuildFi as a full-time job and the company has raised $146m from investors.

Southeast Asian countries such as Thailand and the Philippines have emerged as some of the hottest global gaming hubs.

Teriz Pia, who is 25 and lives in Manila, quit her job as a preschool teacher last June after her brother founded a play-to-earn gaming guild, Real Deal Guild.

Now she says she makes as much as $20,000 a month through her network of more than 300 players across multiple games, plus other crypto assets.

For Axie Infinity Pia lets her players keep 70%, while she takes a 30% cut. In another play-to-earn game, Pegaxy, where players buy and trade NFTs of virtual horses to compete in races to win crypto tokens, she splits it 60:40.

“I don’t call them workers. I just call them my friends, or my scholars,” she said. “The salary in the Philippines if you’re a teacher ... I’m a college graduate, I’m an educator, but it’s not enough. I never imagined that I could earn this kind of money.”

But Pia cautioned that it was a dangerous business.

“There’s a lot of risk. When I’m investing in a new game ... being a member of Real Deal Guild, we have a partnership team, we have researchers, but at the end of the day, it’s still crypto, it’s still a risk.”

One of the biggest play-to-earn networks, Yield Guild Games, said it had 10,000 Axie Infinity players as of the fourth quarter of 2021 who kept 70% of their earnings and had received $11.7m in total.

Australian-based Corey Wilton, 25, founded Pegaxy, which he says has about 160,000 daily users. He estimates that 95% of users of play-to-earn games participate as “renters”, generating revenue without owning the assets, while 5% are asset owners.

No safety net

Legal experts warn there is no safety net for players who effectively invest in risky assets, leaving them highly vulnerable should a project fail or the market for the assets dry up.

As global regulators seek to get to grips with cryptocurrencies themselves, there is little oversight of NFTs or the relatively niche offshoot of play-to-earn games, which typically use in-game crypto tokens that can then be cashed out into traditional money.

“Storing any value in projects like this is risky. The earning in play to earn, blockchain-based games is often through rewards paid in the native token of the project,” said David Lee, cryptocurrency associate at London-based law firm Fladgate.

“There are no guaranteed values of either the token or the in-game asset as their value is often determined by supply and demand in the market. This means there can be significant volatility in the price and, if the project becomes less popular or is abandoned, then there is a potential for the assets to become worthless.”

Yet advocates of these games say success is built upon a combination of factors such as skill, strategy and luck.

“There is definitely money to be made, but there is also money to be lost here, Wilton added. “Play to earn should not be confused with charity, that’s how people get hurt.”

Reuters