We've got news for you.

Register on BusinessLIVE at no cost to receive newsletters, read exclusive articles & more.
Register now
The V3 Tesla supercharger equipment during the presentation of the new charge system in in Berlin, Germany. Picture: REUTERS/MICHELE TANTUSS
The V3 Tesla supercharger equipment during the presentation of the new charge system in in Berlin, Germany. Picture: REUTERS/MICHELE TANTUSS

Detroit — You glide silently out of the Tesla showroom in your sleek new electric Model 3, satisfied you’re looking great and doing your bit for the planet. But keep going — you will have to drive 21,725km before you are doing less harm to the environment than a petrol-guzzling car.

That is the result of a Reuters analysis of data from a model that calculates the lifetime emissions of vehicles, a hotly debated issue that is taking centre stage as governments around the world push for greener transport to meet climate targets.

The model was developed by the Argonne National Laboratory in Chicago and includes thousands of parameters from the type metals in an electric vehicle (EV) battery to the amount of aluminium or plastic in a car.

Argonne’s Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions and Energy Use in Technologies (GREET) model is now being used with other tools to help shape policy at the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board, the two main regulators of vehicle emissions in the US.

Jarod Cory Kelly, principal energy systems analyst at Argonne, said making EVs generates more carbon than combustion engine cars, mainly due to the extraction and processing of minerals in EV batteries and production of the power cells.

But estimates as to how big that carbon gap is when a car is first sold and where the break-even point comes for EVs during their lifetime can vary widely, depending on the assumptions.

Kelly said the payback period then depends on factors such as the size of the EV's battery, the fuel economy of a petrol car and how the power used to charge an EV is generated.


Reuters plugged a series of variables into the Argonne model, which has more than 43,000 users this year, to come up with some answers.

The Tesla 3 scenario above was for driving in the US, where 23% of electricity comes from coal-fired plants, with a 54kWh battery and a cathode made of nickel, cobalt and aluminium, among other variables. It was up against a petrol-fuelled Toyota Corolla weighing 1,340kg with a fuel efficiency of 7l/100km. It was assumed both vehicles would travel 280,000km during their lifetimes.

But if the same Tesla was being driven in Norway, which generates almost all its electricity from renewable hydropower, the break-even point would come after just 13,500km.

If the electricity to recharge the EV comes entirely from coal, which generates the majority of the power in countries such as China and Poland, you would have to drive 126,000km to reach carbon parity with the Corolla, according to the Reuters analysis of data generated by Argonne’s model.

The Reuters analysis showed that the production of a midsized EV saloon generates 47g of C02 per 1.6km during the extraction and production process, or more than 8.1-million grams before it reaches the first customer. By comparison, a similar petrol vehicle generates 32g per 1.6km, or more than 5.5-million grams.

Michael Wang, senior scientist and director of the Systems Assessment Centre at Argonne’s Energy Systems division, said EVs then generally emit far less carbon over a 12-year lifespan.

Even in the worst-case scenario where an EV is charged only from a coal-fired grid, it would generate an extra 4.1-million grams of carbon a year, while a comparable p etrol car would produce over 4.6-million grams, the Reuters analysis showed.

Online program

The EPA told Reuters it uses GREET to help evaluate standards for renewable fuel and vehicle greenhouse gases, while the California Air Resources Board uses the model to help assess compliance with the state’s low-carbon fuel standard.

The EPA said it also used Argonne’s GREET to develop an online program that allows US consumers to estimate the emissions from EVs based on the fuels used to generate electric power in their area.

The results of the Reuters analysis are similar to those in a life-cycle assessment of electric and combustion-engine vehicles in Europe by research group IHS Markit.

Its “well-to-wheel” study showed the typical break-even point in carbon emissions for EVs was about 24,000km to 32,000km, depending on the country, according to Vijay Subramanian, IHS Markit’s global director of compliance. He said using such an approach showed there were long-term benefits from shifting to electric vehicles.

Some are less positive about EVs. University of Liege researcher Damien Ernst said in 2019 that the typical EV would have to travel nearly 700,000km before it emitted less CO2 than a comparable petrol vehicle. He later revised his figures down. Now, he estimates the break-even point could be between 67,000km and 151,000km.

Some other groups also continue to argue that EVs are not necessarily cleaner or greener than fossil-fuelled cars.

The American Petroleum Institute, which represents over 600 companies in the oil industry, states on its website: “Multiple studies show that, on a life-cycle basis, different automobile power trains result in similar greenhouse gas emissions.”

Argonne National Laboratory is funded by the US department of energy and operated by the University of Chicago.



Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

Commenting is subject to our house rules.