Google scientists claim ‘quantum supremacy’ in computing
IBM is sceptical, however, as quantum computing comes up with solutions several hundreds of millions of times faster than classical algos
Paris — Scientists claimed on Wednesday to have achieved a near-mythical state of computing in which a new generation of machine vastly outperforms the world’s fastest super-computer, known as “quantum supremacy”.
A team of experts working on Google’s Sycamore machine said their quantum system had executed a calculation in 200 seconds that would have taken a classic computer 10,000 years to complete.
A rival team at IBM has already expressed scepticism about their claim.
However, if verified and harnessed, the Google device could make even the world’s most powerful super-computers — capable of performing a giddying 20,000-trillion calculations per second — look like an early 2000s flip-phone.
Regular computers, even the fastest known to man, function in binary fashion: they carry out tasks using tiny fragments of data known as bits that are only ever either 1 or 0. Fragments of data on a quantum computer, however, can be both 1 and 0 at the same time, harnessing some of the most mind-boggling powers of quantum mechanics to create exponentially larger amounts of information.
These fragments are known as qubits, and due to their dual-state nature can drastically accumulate computing power. In a study published in Nature, the international team designed a quantum processor made up of 54 qubits and used it to perform a task related to random-number generation.
The Sycamore sampled and verified the accuracy of the solutions all within 200 seconds, a process that on a regular machine would take 10,000 years — several hundreds of millions of times faster, in other words.
“This demonstration of quantum supremacy over today’s leading classical algorithms on the world’s leading super-computers is truly a remarkable achievement,” William Oliver, a computer researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), wrote in a comment piece on the discovery.
He likened the breakthrough to the first manned flight taken by the Wright Brothers at the beginning of the 20th century.
“Their airplane wasn’t the first airborne vehicle to fly and it didn’t solve any pressing transport problem,” Oliver wrote. “It is what the event represented, rather than what it practically accomplished that was paramount. And so it is with this first report of quantum computational supremacy.”
Not so fast?
The quest for quantum supremacy is still far from over, however, with the authors themselves acknowledging the need for better hardware and more sophisticated monitoring techniques to truly harness the power of quantum.
Some immediate applications of quantum computing could be in inscription software and artificial intelligence (AI), but its calculations could eventually lead to more efficient solar panels, drug design, and even quicker and better financial transactions.
Wednesday’s announcement was not without controversy though. After a leaked draft of the Google lab’s paper appeared online last month, chip maker IBM, which runs its own quantum computing programme, said that boasts of the Sycamore computer’s feats were exaggerated.
Instead of 10,000 years for an ordinary super-computer to match Sycamore’s performance, IBM scientists, in a blog post, claimed it would be more like 2.5 years using the most sophisticated traditional processors.
They wrote, “Because the original meaning of the term ‘quantum supremacy’ ... was to describe the point where quantum computers can do things that classical computers can’t, this threshold has not been met.”