subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now
Chinese President Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump. Picture: REUTERS
Chinese President Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump. Picture: REUTERS

Hong Kong/Washington/Beijing — China threatened unspecified “strong countermeasures” if the US Congress enacts legislation supporting Hong Kong protesters, in a sign of the deepening strain between the world’s two largest economies as they attempt to seal a trade deal.

China’s foreign ministry issued the warning on Wednesday after the US House passed a package of measures backing a pro-democracy movement that has rocked the former British colony for more than four months. Among them was the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act, which subjects the city’s special US trading status to annual reviews and provides for sanctions against officials deemed responsible for undermining its “fundamental freedoms and autonomy”.

The threat roiled markets during Asian trading, at one point wiping out a 0.8% rally in the regional equity benchmark. Futures on the S&P 500 Index were still down 0.2% as of 8.06am in London after falling twice that much in Asia. The yuan was also 0.2% lower against the dollar offshore.

While the legislation must also pass the US Senate and be signed by US President Donald Trump to become law, it already has strong bipartisan support in the Republican-run upper chamber. The Hong Kong measures were passed by the Democrat-controlled House by unanimous voice votes on Tuesday.

Chinese ministry of foreign affairs spokesperson Geng Shuang warned American law makers to stop meddling in China’s internal affairs “before falling off the edge of the cliff”, without specifying how it would retaliate. The House action “fully exposes the shocking hypocrisy of some in the US on human rights and democracy and their malicious intention to undermine Hong Kong’s prosperity and stability to contain China’s development”, Geng said.

Both Trump and Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping have so far prevented the international uproar over Hong Kong from scuttling their trade talks. The two sides went ahead with negotiations and reached some broad agreements last week, even though the House vote was widely expected at the time.

“I don’t think this will undermine the prospect of signing a partial deal next month,” said Wang Huiyao, an adviser to China’s cabinet and founder of the Centre for China and Globalisation in Beijing. “The Hong Kong bill is not a done deal and there is still room for redemption.”

A spokesperson for the Hong Kong government “expressed regret” over the House action, which came hours before CEO Carrie Lam was slated to deliver her annual policy address. Lam barely got a few words of the address on Wednesday before pro-democracy lawmakers forced her to stop talking.

The Chinese ministry of foreign affairs’ local branch in the city issued a separate statement warning the US against ‘playing the Hong Kong card ... They are lifting the stone only to drop it on their own feet’

With a projector shining the protest slogan “Five Demands, Not One Less” onto her face, Lam repeatedly paused as the opposition shouted over her in the Legislative Council, known as LegCo. Finally she gave up, and delivered her annual policy address, which normally details economic priorities, via video instead.

Earlier this week, tens of thousands of protesters gathered in Hong Kong’s central district urging the legislation’s passage as sign of international support, many of them waving American flags.

US law makers have embraced the Hong Kong protesters’ cause as the year-long trade war fuels American support for pushing back against China, and they have hosted some of the city’s activists on Capitol Hill in recent weeks. The National Basketball Association’s (NBA) struggle to manage the Chinese backlash against a Houston Rockets executive’s support for the movement has only focused wider attention on the debate.

On Tuesday, the House passed H.Res. 543, a resolution re-affirming the relationship between the US and Hong Kong, condemning Chinese interference in the region and voicing support for protesters. Law makers also passed the Protect Hong Kong Act, H.R. 4270, which would halt the export to Hong Kong of crowd-control devices such as tear gas and rubber bullets.

Dismissing Beijing threats

Representative Chris Smith, a New Jersey Republican and a sponsor of the main Hong Kong bill, predicted that the Senate would pass the legislation and dismissed the threats from Beijing.

“Retaliation, that’s all they ever talk,” Smith told Bloomberg TV. “They try to browbeat and cower people, countries, presidents, prime ministers and the like all over in order to get them to back off. We believe that human rights are so elemental, and so in need of protection. And that’s why the students and the young people are out in the streets in Hong Kong virtually every day.”

In addition, the House adopted a resolution by foreign affairs committee chair Eliot Engel of New York and the panel’s top Republican, Michael McCaul of Texas, urging Canada to start US extradition proceedings against Huawei Technologies executive Meng Wanzhou. The resolution, H.Res. 521, also calls for the release of two Canadians detained in China and due process for a third sentenced to death for drug smuggling.

Republican Senators Rick Scott of Florida, Ted Cruz of Texas and Josh Hawley of Missouri visited Hong Kong over the two-week congressional recess that ended on Tuesday. Hawley met with local pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong and got into a back-and-forth with Lam over whether Hong Kong is a becoming a “police state”.

The Chinese ministry of foreign affairs’ local branch in the city issued a separate statement warning the US against “playing the Hong Kong card ... They are lifting the stone only to drop it on their own feet”, it said.

David Zweig, an emeritus professor at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and director of Transnational China Consulting, noted that the US legislation stopped short of altering the Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, which provides the city’s special trading status. So both the bill and any Chinese retaliation would have limited impact.

“China needs to posture with a retaliation of some kind,” Zweig said. “But this is really a secondary issue as long as they keep the Hong Kong Policy Act intact. The House could have gone much further with the Hong Kong Policy Act. And they didn’t.”

Bloomberg

subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.