Now the justice department is keeping the record of the Zondo state capture commission away from the NPA
10 June 2025 - 13:23
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
During the course of a wide-ranging 27 minute interview with Newsroom Afrika, national director of public prosecutions Shamila Batohi insisted that the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) was independent.
She couldn’t be more wrong. The concept of “independence” is rather like pregnancy: no constitutionally created body can be a little independent; it is either independent or not.
The NPA, a creature of chapter eight of the constitution, is operated as a programme within the department of justice. The minister of justice has “final responsibility over” the NPA and its accounting officer is the director-general of justice. The minister must concur in prosecution policy. These features point away from the claimed independence of the NPA.
Apart from these structural constitutional restraints, the operations of the NPA are influenced by the politics of the day. For example, all attempts to have former police minister Bheki Cele charged for his proven role in the irregular 2010 Fifa World Cup soccer leases for police headquarters in Pretoria and Durban have come to nought. The NPA even had the gall to refer the investigation to the Hawks, a police body, expecting the Hawks to investigate their minister on serious corruption charges. It is no surprise that nothing has come of the complaint.
Infiltration of the NPA by saboteurs intent on protecting the corrupt has been publicly discussed since the days of Hermione Cronje, which ended in March 2022. Now the department of justice is keeping the record of the Zondo state capture commission away from the NPA, despite the relevance of that record to the investigations recommended in the report. This blocking activity is further evidence of executive interference in the work of the NPA.
Paul Hoffman Director, Accountability Now
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 200 words may be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: NPA is patently not independent
Now the justice department is keeping the record of the Zondo state capture commission away from the NPA
During the course of a wide-ranging 27 minute interview with Newsroom Afrika, national director of public prosecutions Shamila Batohi insisted that the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) was independent.
She couldn’t be more wrong. The concept of “independence” is rather like pregnancy: no constitutionally created body can be a little independent; it is either independent or not.
The NPA, a creature of chapter eight of the constitution, is operated as a programme within the department of justice. The minister of justice has “final responsibility over” the NPA and its accounting officer is the director-general of justice. The minister must concur in prosecution policy. These features point away from the claimed independence of the NPA.
Apart from these structural constitutional restraints, the operations of the NPA are influenced by the politics of the day. For example, all attempts to have former police minister Bheki Cele charged for his proven role in the irregular 2010 Fifa World Cup soccer leases for police headquarters in Pretoria and Durban have come to nought. The NPA even had the gall to refer the investigation to the Hawks, a police body, expecting the Hawks to investigate their minister on serious corruption charges. It is no surprise that nothing has come of the complaint.
Infiltration of the NPA by saboteurs intent on protecting the corrupt has been publicly discussed since the days of Hermione Cronje, which ended in March 2022. Now the department of justice is keeping the record of the Zondo state capture commission away from the NPA, despite the relevance of that record to the investigations recommended in the report. This blocking activity is further evidence of executive interference in the work of the NPA.
Paul Hoffman
Director, Accountability Now
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 200 words may be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
NPA under fire to ace tender fraud case against Magashule
Court relaxes bail for Steinhoff accused as NPA prepares for trial
Retired judge Sisi Khampepe to head inquiry into apartheid crime investigations
NPA should have taken the stand, argues Ace Magashule’s ex-PA in extradition case
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Panel should advise Ramaphosa on Batohi’s successor, think-tank says
EDITORIAL: Crisis of confidence in SA justice
Asbestos trial set for 2026 as court’s finding on Magashule’s PA creates issue ...
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.