DA did a better job of representing SA interests in Washington than country’s president
09 March 2025 - 16:42
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
According to the department of international relations & co-operation’s spokesperson, minister Ronald Lamola views the DA’s visit as out of line because only the executive is empowered to represent SA’s foreign policy.
The spokesperson insisted that the government is committed to nonalignment and advancing the national interest, which he equated with SA’s “nation-building project”, meaning redressing past wrongs and improving the quality of life of all South Africans. It is yet another tired reference to apartheid.
This is problematic. The ANC cannot shed its autocratic instincts. It knows best, and should be left to govern free of outside intrusion, regardless of the reality that it has brought the country to its knees. It is a principal reason why so many South Africans remain in abject poverty.
Emma Powell, as an MP and member of the foreign affairs portfolio committee, has a legitimate role. By all accounts the DA mission did a better job serving SA’s interests than the government delegation, which is not welcome in Washington.
This is hardly surprising. In a recent act of self-sabotage President Cyril Ramaphosa, writing in Foreign Policy magazine, criticised Donald Trump and expressed his belief in “protagonism, not supplication”.
He and his co-authors committed to complying with the International Criminal Court arrest warrants against Israeli premier Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant.
This is as Trump’s executive order lambastes SA’s genocide case against Israel, but not against Hamas, at the International Court of Justice. Ramaphosa chooses confrontation.
Finally, the government’s protestations of nonalignment become tedious when the evidence suggests otherwise. During his 2024 visit to the US Lamola refused to criticise Russia for invading Ukraine, even when pressed.
François Theron Pretoria
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: Ramaphosa antagonises Trump
DA did a better job of representing SA interests in Washington than country’s president
Sisanda Mbolekwa’s article refers (“DA’s US trip to ‘stabilise diplomatic relations’ irks Lamola”, March 5).
According to the department of international relations & co-operation’s spokesperson, minister Ronald Lamola views the DA’s visit as out of line because only the executive is empowered to represent SA’s foreign policy.
The spokesperson insisted that the government is committed to nonalignment and advancing the national interest, which he equated with SA’s “nation-building project”, meaning redressing past wrongs and improving the quality of life of all South Africans. It is yet another tired reference to apartheid.
This is problematic. The ANC cannot shed its autocratic instincts. It knows best, and should be left to govern free of outside intrusion, regardless of the reality that it has brought the country to its knees. It is a principal reason why so many South Africans remain in abject poverty.
Emma Powell, as an MP and member of the foreign affairs portfolio committee, has a legitimate role. By all accounts the DA mission did a better job serving SA’s interests than the government delegation, which is not welcome in Washington.
This is hardly surprising. In a recent act of self-sabotage President Cyril Ramaphosa, writing in Foreign Policy magazine, criticised Donald Trump and expressed his belief in “protagonism, not supplication”.
He and his co-authors committed to complying with the International Criminal Court arrest warrants against Israeli premier Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant.
This is as Trump’s executive order lambastes SA’s genocide case against Israel, but not against Hamas, at the International Court of Justice. Ramaphosa chooses confrontation.
Finally, the government’s protestations of nonalignment become tedious when the evidence suggests otherwise. During his 2024 visit to the US Lamola refused to criticise Russia for invading Ukraine, even when pressed.
François Theron
Pretoria
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
US leaves SA with over $1bn climate financing hole
State meets funders in bid to plug $440m gap from loss of US aid
Leon Schreiber slaps down EFF MP over Musk
Microsoft makes R5.4bn bet on SA
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
HILARY JOFFE: Budget process requires a deeper debate
LETTER: Putin is SA’s enemy
LETTER: Ramaphosa’s misguided hubris
GERHARD ERASMUS: SA wants to conclude deals with Trump — how, when and about ...
Ramaphosa wants to seal trade deals with Trump
Ramaphosa condemns remarks by AfriForum and Solidarity during their US visit
PETER BRUCE: SA could whistle Dixie for funds US has say over
G20 economies must collaborate, says Cas Coovadia
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.