The fortunate have become more fortunate while the poor and their children suffer
05 November 2024 - 15:46
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
It was stated in the 2024 medium-term budget policy statement (MTBPS) that “over the past 15 years public debt has accumulated, driven by a wide gap between spending and revenue. This led to increasing debt-service costs consuming resources that could have been used for priorities such as education, healthcare and infrastructure”.
The National Treasury is essentially saying that the money that should have gone to education, healthcare and infrastructure is instead going to wealthy members of society — after all, it is the wealthy who have government bonds through investment funds. The fortunate become more fortunate while the poor and their children suffer.
The government does not have to “issue debt” (sell bonds) to be able to spend. The issue of bonds acts rather as an interest rate maintenance strategy. The increases in the repo rate, and therefore the commercial bank borrowing rate, also act as a basic income grant for anyone who already has invested money, by increasing the return on that money.
The government can actually provide both the money for so-called debt service and the necessary expenditure for decent education and healthcare. The constraints are the availability of real resources — labour, skills and experience, as well as energy, technology and materials. Finance is not a limiting factor, except when eventually there may be inflationary pressures. Debt service costs don’t “consume” resources.
The MTBPS further reads that “the state is on track to achieve primary surpluses over the medium term”, as though this is a positive step. Yet surpluses extractmoney from the private sector, resulting in recessionary-type influences. We need greater spending, bigger deficits, as long as the right goods and services are available for purchase.
The economy is about things and people, and 12-million people are excluded from economic activity. It is an absolute shame.
Howard Pearce Rondebosch
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: Shameful boosting of rich
The fortunate have become more fortunate while the poor and their children suffer
It was stated in the 2024 medium-term budget policy statement (MTBPS) that “over the past 15 years public debt has accumulated, driven by a wide gap between spending and revenue. This led to increasing debt-service costs consuming resources that could have been used for priorities such as education, healthcare and infrastructure”.
The National Treasury is essentially saying that the money that should have gone to education, healthcare and infrastructure is instead going to wealthy members of society — after all, it is the wealthy who have government bonds through investment funds. The fortunate become more fortunate while the poor and their children suffer.
The government does not have to “issue debt” (sell bonds) to be able to spend. The issue of bonds acts rather as an interest rate maintenance strategy. The increases in the repo rate, and therefore the commercial bank borrowing rate, also act as a basic income grant for anyone who already has invested money, by increasing the return on that money.
The government can actually provide both the money for so-called debt service and the necessary expenditure for decent education and healthcare. The constraints are the availability of real resources — labour, skills and experience, as well as energy, technology and materials. Finance is not a limiting factor, except when eventually there may be inflationary pressures. Debt service costs don’t “consume” resources.
The MTBPS further reads that “the state is on track to achieve primary surpluses over the medium term”, as though this is a positive step. Yet surpluses extract money from the private sector, resulting in recessionary-type influences. We need greater spending, bigger deficits, as long as the right goods and services are available for purchase.
The economy is about things and people, and 12-million people are excluded from economic activity. It is an absolute shame.
Howard Pearce
Rondebosch
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
DUMA GQUBULE: Government of neoliberal unity capitulates in budget
Fitch sceptical about medium-term budget forecasts
Godongwana cautious on lowering inflation target
SAM MKOKELI: Could Treasury have done more for GNU honeymoon?
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
LETTER: Mashele is right about skills
LETTER: Free up funds for CCMA
LETTER: Obstacles curtail growth
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.