Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
The legal battle between the Electoral Commission of SA (IEC) and former president Jacob Zuma has created a psyche of distrust in certain quarters, causing myriad problems for the upcoming elections.
A recusal application brought by Zuma effectively renders chief justice Raymond Zondo a conflicted party, who pushed for his own desired outcome through a majority judgment that delivered a law-like imitation of justice. It doesn’t logically follow that Zondo would act as a judge to hear a case about his own misconduct and a misjudgement of the justices of his ilk.
Truth be told, Zondo violated our everyday legal practice to undermine the significance of a hierarchy of the courts. Direct access to the Constitutional Court for a contempt of court dispute was a vindictive miscue with malice afterthought that yielded an overkill to misjudge Zuma out of blind hatred. That’s a worse sin than a hearsay aberration concocted as admissible evidence to impeach former Western Cape judge president John Hlope. It’s a kind of selective justice, if not a lack of divine finesse steeped in justice, which cost the nation an unspeakable loss of innocent lives and violent destruction of our democratic gains.
All this would remain an indelible stain on the anecdotes about the legacy of Zondo. Worse, the three wasted years of the state capture commission under Zondo culminated in a deliberate misdirection of the apex court to the point of misjudgement on account of dereliction of duty.
It’s the very misjudgement that came back to haunt us, creating an albatross for the IEC. That is beside the misdirection overlaid with irregularities stemming from prejudices imposed by judges to prove a point simply out of pride, without care of the consequences. Hence they should be equally impeached.
Morgan Phaahla Ekurhuleni
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: Imitation justice
The legal battle between the Electoral Commission of SA (IEC) and former president Jacob Zuma has created a psyche of distrust in certain quarters, causing myriad problems for the upcoming elections.
A recusal application brought by Zuma effectively renders chief justice Raymond Zondo a conflicted party, who pushed for his own desired outcome through a majority judgment that delivered a law-like imitation of justice. It doesn’t logically follow that Zondo would act as a judge to hear a case about his own misconduct and a misjudgement of the justices of his ilk.
Truth be told, Zondo violated our everyday legal practice to undermine the significance of a hierarchy of the courts. Direct access to the Constitutional Court for a contempt of court dispute was a vindictive miscue with malice afterthought that yielded an overkill to misjudge Zuma out of blind hatred. That’s a worse sin than a hearsay aberration concocted as admissible evidence to impeach former Western Cape judge president John Hlope. It’s a kind of selective justice, if not a lack of divine finesse steeped in justice, which cost the nation an unspeakable loss of innocent lives and violent destruction of our democratic gains.
All this would remain an indelible stain on the anecdotes about the legacy of Zondo. Worse, the three wasted years of the state capture commission under Zondo culminated in a deliberate misdirection of the apex court to the point of misjudgement on account of dereliction of duty.
It’s the very misjudgement that came back to haunt us, creating an albatross for the IEC. That is beside the misdirection overlaid with irregularities stemming from prejudices imposed by judges to prove a point simply out of pride, without care of the consequences. Hence they should be equally impeached.
Morgan Phaahla
Ekurhuleni
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
‘Constitutional duty’ for top court to hear John Hlophe, say his lawyers
MARTINA BIENE: Freedom Day: a time for SA to consider how best to reach our dream deferred
LETTER: IEC jumps the gun
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.