subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now
Picture: FILE
Picture: FILE

Your article by Stuart Theobald (Apartheid-era law used against FlySafair, April 13) makes very good sense.

In it, Theobald says things like “FlySafair has left me impressed”. And he says “dredging up an apartheid-era piece of legislation to fight off an agile, effective competitor doesn’t look good — yet that’s what Global Airways and Airlink are doing”.

Well done, Mr Theobald.

But he does not mention the huge dozing elephant in the room: SAA. This past weekend, the press mentioned that within only 10 years, FlySafair has become the holder of more than 60% of the local market. That’s smart and effective work. Hats off to them. And against that, the press mentions that over that 10-year period, the state had to cough up R16.5bn to keep SAA afloat.

To those in the airline industry: pull up your socks.

Don MacRobert
Cape Town

JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.

subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.