subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now
Picture: 123RF
Picture: 123RF

While the proposed amendment to the Prevention & Combating of Corrupt Activities Act via the Judicial Matters Amendment Bill appears to be a commendable step in the right direction, the way it is drafted is long-winded and potentially confusing (“Prosecuting the new ‘failure to prevent corrupt activities’ offence a challenge”, December 1).

Someone who has not read the reports prepared by the Zondo state capture commission will find it difficult to envisage the practical setting targeted by the new provision. Why the reference to “member of the private sector”, for instance?

If the intention is to get corporate entities (such as the ones implicated in the corrupt activities identified by chief justice Raymond Zondo) to be vigilant to corruption committed on their behalf, the wording should be more direct and not invite legal arguments as to who is a member of the private sector.

Charles Goredema
Via BusinessLIVE

JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.

subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.