LETTER: Think twice before rejecting medical claims
It would be in Sars’ interests to reimburse medical expenses and so keep taxpayers alive
14 November 2023 - 17:53
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Having had the bulk of my medical expense claims rejected by the SA Revenue Service (Sars) it occurs to me how illogical the government policy on health and medical expenses is. Surely, with the dwindling number of legitimate tax payers it would be in Sars’ interests to keep them alive?
I fail to see how Sars could reject my claims, as every operation was separately identified in a spreadsheet, with each tax invoice from the hospitals and medical service provider paid for through my bank account and accounted for through Xero software and audited by my accountant. Every invoice was scanned in date order and numbered to match the spreadsheet and bank statement details, and submitted electronically through efiling.
Speaking to many of my friends, it seems that Sars’ default position is to reject any claims, home office expenses in particular. It’s okay though. The medical services in SA are still excellent, and I live on to continue to pay more tax, but grudgingly.
Andy Clay Via email
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: Think twice before rejecting medical claims
It would be in Sars’ interests to reimburse medical expenses and so keep taxpayers alive
Having had the bulk of my medical expense claims rejected by the SA Revenue Service (Sars) it occurs to me how illogical the government policy on health and medical expenses is. Surely, with the dwindling number of legitimate tax payers it would be in Sars’ interests to keep them alive?
I fail to see how Sars could reject my claims, as every operation was separately identified in a spreadsheet, with each tax invoice from the hospitals and medical service provider paid for through my bank account and accounted for through Xero software and audited by my accountant. Every invoice was scanned in date order and numbered to match the spreadsheet and bank statement details, and submitted electronically through efiling.
Speaking to many of my friends, it seems that Sars’ default position is to reject any claims, home office expenses in particular. It’s okay though. The medical services in SA are still excellent, and I live on to continue to pay more tax, but grudgingly.
Andy Clay
Via email
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
LETTER: State risks becoming a predator on reluctant taxpayers
NEVA MAKGETLA: State has better options than harsh spending cuts
Don’t increase taxes; improve collection efficiency
EDITORIAL: Emigration trends bode ill for SA growth
EDITORIAL: Top court’s Sars disclosure ruling welcome
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
TIISETSO MOTSOENENG: The risks and rewards of giving Sars more power to fight ...
Don’t increase taxes; improve collection efficiency
LETTER: State risks becoming a predator on reluctant taxpayers
PETER ATTARD MONTALTO: A scythe to the fiscal mania
MANDY DIX-PEEK: Nowhere to hide as taxman raises stakes for trustees, ...
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.